The Bundle Theory Dialectic of Attributing the Legal Personality to (AI) A Study of European Artificial Intelligence Law and German Civil law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/kpnzsn61Keywords:
Bundle Theory, Legal Personality, Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Personality, European Robotics LawAbstract
The Bundle Theory, or Electronic Personhood Theory, in the context of artificial intelligence (AI), is a theory adopted by the European legislature under the Artificial Intelligence Act 2024. It represents a legal and philosophical approach aimed at treating intelligent entities (such as robots and advanced AI systems) as independent legal persons, bearing certain responsibilities or possessing certain rights. The theory suggests that legal personality is not a fixed entity, but rather a bundle of legal attributes (such as financial liability, the right to sue, and liability) that can be granted to entities as needed. This theory has been used to grant legal status to companies and legal entities. Consequently, a future-oriented perspective has emerged, recognizing the legal personality of robots equipped with artificial intelligence, in order to hold them liable for damages that may be caused by their application to advanced AI systems. In our research, we adopted a descriptive approach by reviewing and analyzing conflicting jurisprudential opinions regarding the attribution of legal personality. We also defined the concept of the bundle theory and demonstrated its acceptability, with the aim of assessing the final position of the legal personality of artificial intelligence. Among the results of this study, as an approach to the problem of attributing legal personality, is the possibility of attributing legal personality to artificial intelligence under the bundle theory, considering it an electronic third party, subject to two restrictions: the first is its nature, which prevents it from acquiring certain special family rights; and the second is the restriction of specialization, which limits legal activities to the purpose for which it was created.
Downloads
References
I. A.Hamoui, La responsabilité civile médicale à l’épreuve de l’intelligence artificielle, Mémoire, Master , Paris II,2020
II. Abdul Rahman Mazen Abdul Rahman Al-Majali, The Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence Enjoying Legal Personality - Mansoura, 2025
III. Abdullah Saeed Abdullah Al-Wali, Civil Liability for Harmful Effects of Artificial Intelligence Applications in UAE Law, A Comparative Analytical Study, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Egypt, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Ilmiyyah, UAE, 2021
IV. Alexandre Cassart, «Aéronefs sans pilote, voitures sans conducteur: la destination plus importante que le voyage», dans ouvrage collectif: L’intelligence artificielle et le droit, sous la coordination de Hervé Jacquemin et Alexandre De Streel, 2ème edition, Larcier, Belgique, 2018
V. Alistair Walsh, Saudi Arabia Grants Citizenship to robot Sophia, DW, 2017, available at: https://www.dw.com/en/saudi-arabia-grants-citizenship-torobot-sophia/a-41150856.
VI. Andrade, F., Novais, P., Machado, J., & Neves, J. (2007). Intelligent Contracting: Software Agents, Corporate Bodies and Virtual Organizations. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, P. Novais, & C. Analide (Eds.), Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks (pp. 217-224). Springer US.
VII. A-S.Choné-Grimaldi et Philippe Glaser, Responsabilité civile du fait du robot doué d'intelligence artificielle : faut-il créer une personnalité robotique ? »,Contrats Concurrence Consommation n° 1, Janvier 2018, alerte 1 ; A. Bensoussan et J. Bensoussan, Droit des robots, Editions Larcier 2015, p. 41 et s.
VIII. Bensoussan, Droit des robots : science-fiction ou anticipation ? D. 2015. 1640 ; A.-S. Choné-Grimaldi et Ph. Glaser, Responsabilité civile du fait du robot doué d'intelligence artificielle : faut-il créer une responsabilité robotique ? CCC 2018. Alerte 1
IX. Bensoussan, Plaidoyer pour un droit des robots : de la « personne morale » à la « personne robot », La lettre des juristes d’affaires, 23 oct. 2013, n° 1134 ; A. Bensoussan, J. Bensoussan, Droit des robots, Larcier, 2015
X. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2018). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In R. V. Yampolskiy (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security (1st ed., pp. 57-69). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351251389-4
XI. Bottomley, D., & Thaldar, D. (2023). Liability for harm caused by Al in healthcare: an overview of the core legal concepts. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 14, 1297353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1297353
XII. Caroline Cauffman , Robo-liability : the European Union in search of the best way to deal with liability for damage caused by artificial intelligence , Maastricht journal of European and Comparative law 527 , vol 24 (5) , 2018
XIII. Chesterman, S. (2020a). Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Legal Personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819-844. https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0020589320000366
XIV. Chesterman, S. (2020b). Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Autonomy. Notre Dame Journal on Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 210-250. https://scholarship.law. nd.edu/ndlsiet/voll/iss2/1
XV. Christian Youssef, Civil Liability for the Acts of Artificial Intelligence, 1st ed., Al-Halabi Legal Publications, Beirut, Lebanon, 2022
XVI. Doomen, J. (2023). The Artificial Intelligence Entity As a Legal Person. Information & Communications Technology Law, 32(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2023.2196827 , John Searle, Minds, Brains and Science (Harvard University Press, 1984) 28; cf. The Rediscovery of the Mind (MIT Press, 2002) 7.
XVII. Dr.Hammam Al-Qawsi, Errors of the Artificial Intelligence-Powered Algorithmic Trading Robot - An orientalist study of the prospects of civil liability in the stock market, Jeel Journal of In-depth Legal Research, Jeel Center for Legal Research, Issue 41, 2020,
XVIII. Dr.Yahya Ahmed Mowafi, The Legal Person and Its Legal Responsibilities, Maaref Establishment, 1987
XIX. Emad. Al-Dahiyat, From Science Fiction to Reality: How will the law adapt to Self-Driving Vehicles?, Journal of Arts and Humanities 7 (9), 2018
XX. Eric Schwitzgebel and Mara Garza, ‘A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences’ (2015) 39 Midwest Studies in Philosophy 98, 104.
XXI. G. Loiseau, M. Bourgeois, Du robot en droit à un droit des robots, JCP G n° 48, nov. 2014, doctr. 1231. 16 V. not.,
XXII. G.Courtois, Robots intelligents et responsabilité; quels régimes, quelles perspectives?, Dalloze IP/IT, juin 2016, n 6
XXIII. Gatt, L., Caggiano, L. A., Gaeta, M. C., Aulino, L., & Troisi, E. (2023). The Possible Relationships Between Law and Ethics Applied to Al. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) (pp. 570-574). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/Met COXRAINE58569.2023.10405648
XXIV. Hamada Muhammad Abd al-Ati Nasr, Civil Liability for the Harmful Effects of Adopting Artificial Intelligence Systems in Corporate Governance: A Comparative Analytical Study, 2024, a research paper published in the Journal of the Secretariat of Sultan Qaboos University - Issue 45, January 2025
XXV. Hammam Al-Qawsi: The Problem of the Person Responsible for Operating the Robot (The Impact of the Human Deputy Theory on the Future Effectiveness of Law) A Prospective Analytical Study of the Rules of European Civil Law on Robotics, Generation Center for Scientific Research, Jabal Journal of In-Depth Legal Research, Issue 25, May 2018
XXVI. Hammam Al-Qawsi :The Theory of the Virtual Personality of the Robot According to the Human Approach: An Authentic, Analytical, and Prospective Study of the Rules of Kuwaiti and European Civil Law, Journal of Generation of In-Depth Legal Research, Generation Center for Scientific Research, Issue 35, May 2019
XXVII. Khaled Mamdouh Ibrahim, Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence, Dar Al Fikr Al Jami’i, Alexandria, 2022
XXVIII. L. Solum, 'Legal personhood for artificial intelligences', 70 N.C.L. Rev.1992, p. 1275.
XXIX. Lawrence B. Solum : Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences, North Carolina law review, School of Law, University of North Carolina, Vol 70, N 4, USA, 1992
XXX. Chopra, S., & White, L.. F. (2011). A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.356801
XXXI. Mahmoud Salama Abdel Moneim Al-Sharif, Criminal Liability of Humans: A Comparative Foundational Study, Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2021, p. 11.
XXXII. Michael S. Moore , The Strictness of Strict Liability , Crim Law and Philos ,29 August , 2017.
XXXIII. Mohamed Fathy Mohamed Ibrahim, The Legal Framework for Liability for the Use of Modern Technology in the Medical Field, Mansoura University, Special Conference Issue, 2022
XXXIV. Muhammad Ahmad Al-Maadawi, Abd Rabbuh Mujahid, Civil Liability for Artificially Intelligent Robots
XXXV. Muhammad Irfan Al-Khatib, Artificial Intelligence and Law, a comparative study of Tunisian and Qatari civil legislation in light of the European rules in the Civil Law for Humans of 2017 and the European Industrial Policy for Human Artificial Intelligence of 2019, BAU Journal-journal of Legal Studies - Volume 2020, article 4
XXXVI. Muhammad Muhammad Abd al-Latif, Liability for Artificial Intelligence between Private Law and Public Law, a paper submitted to the Conference on the Legal and Economic Aspects of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology (May 23-24, 2021), Journal of Legal and Economic Research, a special issue of the 20th Annual International Conference, Faculty of Law, Mansoura University
XXXVII. Muhammad Rabie Anwar Fath Al-Bab, “The Legal Nature of Civil Liability for Robot Damages: A Comparative Analytical Study,” a paper presented at the 20th Annual International Conference, Faculty of Law, Mansoura University, 2021
XXXVIII. Muna Naeem Jaaz. 2024. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Providing Legal Consultations”. Journal of Legal Sciences 39 (1): 542-72. https://doi.org/10.35246/reb92292.
XXXIX. Omar Nafeh Al-Abbasi, The Legal System of Artificial Intelligence, A Comparative Study, 1st ed., Arab Center for Scientific Studies and Research for Publishing and Distribution, Cairo, Egypt, 2023
XL. Othman Ahmed (2021). Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Civil Law (76). Journal of Legal and Economic Research. Faculty of Law, Mansoura University, Egypt,
XLI. P.OPITZ , CIVIL LIABILITY and Autonomous Robotic Machines: Approaches in the EU and US, TTLF Working PAPERS NO. 43 Stanford-Vienna, 2019
XLII. Paul Churchland and Patricia Churchland, ‘Could a Machine Think?’ (1990) 262 Scientific American 32, 37.
XLIII. Cf. Lawrence Solum, ‘Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences’ (1992) 70 North Carolina Law Review 1231, 1265,
XLIV. Steven Livingston and Mathias Risse, ‘The Future Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Humans and Human Rights’ (2019) 33 Ethics & International Affairs 141, 149.
XLV. Tahani Hamed Abu Talib, Robot from the Perspective of Egyptian Civil Law (Personality and Liability), Journal of Jurisprudential and Legal Research, Issue 37, April 2022
XLVI. Ugo pagallo, vital, Sophia, and co. – The quest for the legal personhood of robots,
XLVII. Allgrove, Ben, Legal Personality for Artificial Intellects: Pragmatic Solution or Science Fiction? Baker & McKenzie LLP, London, 2004 , (June 2004). Available at SSRN:
XLVIII. Wafaa Yaqoub Janahi, The Legal Status of Intelligent Robots and Their Operator Liability, previous source
XLIX. Walid Mohammed Almajid : Can Electronic Agents Be Granted Legal Personality under Islamic Law? A Conceptual Rethink Is Imperative, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol 24, N 4, Brill, 2010
Literaturverzeichnis
I. Bauer, Marc Christian: Elektronische Agenten in der virtuellen Welt: ein Beitrag zu Rechtsfragen des Vertragsschlusses, einschließlich der Einbeziehung allgemeiner Geschäftsbedingungen, des Verbraucherschutzes sowie der Haftung, Hamburg 2006. (Zitiert als: Bauer: Elektronische Agenten in der virtuellen Welt, S.)
II. John, Robert: Haftung für künstliche Intelligenz: Rechtliche Beurteilung des Einsatzes intelligenter Softwareagenten im E-Commerce, 1. Aufl., Hamburg 2007. (Zitiert als: John: Haftung für künstliche Intelligenz, S.)
III. Wagner, Gerhard: Roboter als Haftungssubjekte? Konturen eines Haftungsrechts für autonome Systeme, in: Faust, Florian/Schäfer, Hans-Bernd: Zivilrechtliche und rechtsökonomische Probleme des Internet und der künstlichen Intelligenz, 1. Aufl., Tübingen 2019, S.1-40. (Zitiert als: Wagner: Roboter als Haftungssubjekte?, S.)
IV. Kraul, Torsten: Künstliche Intelligenz: Wenn Roboter Verträge schließen, Noerr, 2017. https://www.noerr.com/de/newsroom/news/kunstliche-intelligenz-wenn-roboter-vertrage-schliessen (abgerufen am 29.03.2023). (Zitiert als: Kraul: Künstliche Intelligenz: Wenn Roboter Verträge schließen, https://www.noerr.com/de/newsroom/news/kunstliche-intelligenz-wenn-roboter-vertrage-schliessen abgerufen am)
V. Reusch, Philipp Weider, Niklas M.: Future Law: Blockchain, Industrie 4.0, Internet of Things, Robotik, 1. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main 2018. (Zitiert als: Reusch /Weider: Future Law: Blockchain, Industrie 4.0, Internet of Things, Robotik., S. Rn)
VI. Groß, Johannes: AGB 4.0: Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen im Rahmen autonomer Vertragsschlüsse, DSRITB 2017, 611-624.(Zitiert als: Groß DSRITB 2017, S.)
VII. Kniepert, Cornelius: Die Rechtsfähigkeit autonomer Systeme, JURA – Juristische Ausbildung 2021, S. 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1515/jura-2020-2589 (Zitiert als: Kniepert: Die Rechtsfähigkeit autonomer Systeme, S.)
VIII. Kainer, Friedemann/Förster, Lydia: Autonome Systeme im Kontext des Vertragsrechts, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Privatrechtswissenschaft 2020, S. 275–305. (Zitiert als: Kainer/Förster ZfPW 2020, S.)
IX. Herold, Sophie/Pieper, Fritz: Vertragsfragen im Zusammenhang mit KI, Telemedicus, 10. Februar 2019. https://www.telemedicus.info/vertragsfragen-im-zusammenhang-mit-ki/ (abgerufen am 29.03.2023). (Zitiert als: Herold/Pieper: Vertragsfragen im Zusammenhang mit KI., https://www.telemedicus.info/vertragsfragen-im-zusammenhang-mit-ki/ abgerufen am ..)
X. Leupold, Andreas/Wiebe, Andreas/ Glossner, Silke (Hrsg.): IT-Recht, 4. Auflage, München 2021. (Zitiert als: Leupold/Wiebe/Glossner: IT-Recht, Teil, Rn.)
XI. Linardatos, Dimitrios: Autonome und vernetzte Aktanten im Zivilrecht: Grundlinien zivilrechtlicher Zurechnung und Strukturmerkmale einer elektronischen Person, 1. Aufl., Tübingen 2021. (Zitiert als: Linardatos: Autonome und vernetzte Aktanten im Zivilrecht, S.)
XII. Veith, Charlotte: Künstliche Intelligenz, Haftung und Kartellrecht: Zivilrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit beim Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz und Implikationen für das Kartellrecht, 1. Aufl., Baden-Baden 2021. (Zitiert als: Veith: Künstliche Intelligenz, Haftung und Kartellrecht, S.)
XIII. Grapentin, Justin: Vertragsschluss und vertragliches Verschulden beim Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz und Softwareagenten,1. Aufl., Hamburg 2018. (Zitiert als: Grapentin: Vertragsschluss und vertragliches Verschulden beim Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz und Softwareagenten, S.)
XIV. Thöne, Meik: Autonome Systeme und deliktische Haftung: Verschulden als Instrument adäquater Haftungsallokation? Tübingen 2020. (Zitiert als: Thöne: Autonome Systeme und deliktische Haftung, S.)
XV. Zech, Herbert: Zivilrechtliche Haftung für den Einsatz von Robotern – Zuweisung von Automatisierungs- und Autonomierisiken, in: Gless, Sabine/Seelmann, Kurt (Hrsg.): Intelligente Agenten und das Recht, 1. Aufl., Baden-Baden 2016, S.163-204. (Zitiert als: Herbert: Zivilrechtliche Haftung für den Einsatz von Robotern–Zuweisung von Automatisierungs- und Autonomierisiken, S.)
XVI. Lee, Chien-Liang: Grundfragen der Regulierung von Künstlicher Intelligenz – Kurzanalyse der EU-KI-Verordnung anhand autonomen Fahrens als Referenzgebiet, in: Chan, Chen-Jung/Ennuschat, Jörg/Lee, Chien-Liang/Lin, Yuh-May/Storr, Stefan (Hrsg.): Künstliche Intelligenz und Öffentliches Wirtschaftsrecht ,1. Aufl., Baden-Baden 2022,S.8-35. (Zitiert als: Lee: Grundfragen der Regulierung von Künstlicher Intelligenz, S.)
XVII. Grapentin, Justin: Zivilrechtliche Haftung beim Einsatz Künstlicher Intelligenz, 01.01.2018. https://www.frankfurter-hefte.de/artikel/zivilrechtliche-haftung-beim-einsatz-kuenstlicher-intelligenz-2034/ (abgerufen am 29.03.2023). (Zitiert als: Grapentin: Zivilrechtliche Haftung beim Einsatz Künstlicher Intelligenz, https://www.frankfurter-hefte.de/artikel/zivilrechtliche-haftung-beim-einsatz-kuenstlicher-intelligenz-2034/ abgerufen am..)
XVIII. Schulz, Thomas: Verantwortlichkeit bei autonom agierenden Systemen: Fortentwicklung des Rechts und Gestaltung der Technik, 1. Aufl., Baden-Baden 2015. (Zitiert als: Schulz: Verantwortlichkeit bei autonom agierenden Systemen, S.)
XIX. Pieper, Fritz-Ulli/Gehrmann, Mareike: Künstliche Intelligenz – Wer haftet? LRZ E-Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht und degetaliesierung, 2019, S. 123-128, www.lrz.legal/2019S123. (Zitiert als: Pieper/Gehrmann: LR 2019, S.)
XX. Specht, Louisa/Herold, Sophie: Roboter als Vertragspartner? Gedanken zu Vertragsabschlüssen unter Einbeziehung automatisierter und autonom agierender Systeme, MultiMedia und Recht 2018, S. 40–44. (Zitiert als: Specht/Herold MMR 2018, S.)
LAWS
I. European Parliament ،Civil Law Rules on Robotics of 2017
II. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
