Criminal Penalty Execution Association
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/05v12v61Keywords:
Procedural Association, Criminal Sanction, Execution of Criminal PenaltiesAbstract
The subject of the research is of great importance as it relates to the issue of regulating the rights and obligations included in the executive legal bond between its two parties represented by Its first party is the state, which is entrusted with the correctional administration and judicial authority that protects rights and freedoms, and its second party is the convict, Just as the state has the right to require punishment of the convict, it has the obligation to guarantee the legal status of the convict and the rights and freedoms it includes, guaranteed by the Constitution and the law, The convict is obligated to submit completely in accordance with the provisions of the law to implement the criminal penalty, while retaining all his rights and freedoms that were not deprived of him by the criminal judgment, and which he enjoyed like the rest of the members of society.
Ensuring that balance is achieved within the executive legal nexus requires that the party responsible for implementing punitive treatment methods not prejudice the legal status of the convict, Because implementation does not give the correctional administration the right to deprive the convict of his rights and cause him pain, but rather it exercises a role that is radically different from what it aimed to achieve in the previous era of punitive policy, Rather, in light of modern criminal and penal policy, it has become aimed at achieving reform and rehabilitation of the convict, and creating a sense of deterrence represented by the deprivation of part of his freedom and rights required to achieve his social integration with the rest of the members of society, in addition to not neglecting the concept of what criminal justice aims to achieve, Among its most important goals is the feeling of fairness and equality for the victim, his family, and members of society in the face of the law, in order to deter the previous roots that push towards revenge and revenge against the perpetrator.
Downloads
References
1. References in Arabic
i. Tawfiq Hassan Farag, Introduction to Legal Sciences, Modern Egyptian Office, Alexandria, 1970-1971.
ii. Firas Abdel Moneim Abdullah, Criminal Regulation - Redefining the Function of Criminal Law, research published in the Journal of Legal Sciences, College of Law, University of Baghdad, Volume 38, First Issue, 2023.
iii. Ramses Behnam, The General Theory of Criminal Law, new revised edition, Alexandria Knowledge Institute, Alexandria, 1995
iv. Ahmed Fathi Sorour, The Origins of Criminal Politics, Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya, Cairo, 1972.
v. Mahmoud Naguib Hosni, Explanation of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 3rd edition, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo, 1995.
vi. Ahmed Abdel Aziz Al-Alfy, Guarantees for the Individual in the Punitive Implementation Stage, Third Arab Circle of Social Defense, Damascus, 1973.
vii. Ahmed Fathi Sorour, Constitutional Criminal Law, 2nd edition, Dar Al-Shorouk, Cairo, 2002.
viii. Muhammad Nasr Muhammad, Al-Wajeez in the Science of Criminal Implementation, 1st edition, Library of Law and Economics, Riyadh, 2012.
ix. Wasan Hamid Rashid, Constitutional Guarantees of Rights and Freedoms in the Iraqi Constitution of 2005, Babylon University Journal, Human Sciences, Volume 21, Issue 3, 2013.
x. Abdul Razzaq Talal Jassim, Dualism of the Criminal Rule in Iraqi Law, PhD thesis, College of Law, University of Babylon, 2018.
xi. Ali Adnan Al-Fail, Postponing the Implementation of the Criminal Penalty in Islamic Sharia and Positive Criminal Legislation, Law Journal, Scientific Publishing Council, Kuwait University, Issue 1, Kuwait, vol. 33, without publishing house, 2009.
xii. Alaa Nasser Hussein, Dr. Firas Abdel Moneim Abdullah, Criminal Intent in Terrorist Crime, Journal of Legal Sciences, College of Law, University of Baghdad, Volume Twenty-Nine, First Issue, 2014.
xiii. Mustafa Youssef, Methods of Executing Punishment and its Guarantees, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiyya, Cairo, 2010.
xiv. Medhat Al-Dabisi, Encyclopedia of Criminal Execution, Book Two, Modern University Office Publishing House, Alexandria, 2008.
xv. Akram Abdul Razzaq Al-Mashhadani, Major General Bahjat Al-Bakri, Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Statistical Research in the Judiciary, Police and Prisons, 1st edition, Dar Al-Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution, Jordan, 2009.
xvi. Ali Abdul Qadir Al-Qahwaji, Criminology and Punishment, University Press and Publishing House, 2000.
xvii. Essam Afifi Abdel Basir, Penal Implementation Judge, 1st edition, Dar Al-Kutub, Egypt, 2004.
xviii. Abdul Aziz Muhammad Mohsen, Protecting Human Rights in the Implementation Stage of Criminal Judgments, A Comparative Study, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Jami’i, Alexandria, 2012.
xix. Ahmed Mohamed Allam, Guarantees for the convict during the period of punitive execution, PhD thesis, Faculty of Law, Cairo University, 2012.
xx. Alaa Nasser Hussein, Arbitrary Arrest, research published in Resalat Al-Huqouk Magazine, College of Law, University of Karbala, Volume Six, Issue Two, 2014.
xxi. Ibrahim Muhammad Ali, The Legal System for the Treatment of Prisoners, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabi, Cairo, 2007.
xxii. Kazem Abdullah Al-Shammari, The Subjectivity of Criminal Law, research published in the Journal of the University of Babylon, Administrative and Legal Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 6, 2006.
xxiii. Iqbal Al-Falluji, qualifications of workers in prison institutions and their preparation policy, Arab Journal of Social Defense, No. 16, 1983.
xxiv. Wasan Hamid Rashid, Constitutional Guarantees of Rights and Freedoms in the Iraqi Constitution of 2005, Babylon University Journal, Human Sciences, Volume 21, Issue 3, 2013.
xxv. Saadi Muhammad Al-Khatib, Prisoners’ Rights in accordance with International Human Rights Provisions and Conventions, 2nd edition, Al-Halabi Legal Publications, Beirut, 2010.
2. References in English
I. Grispigni , Diritto penale italiano, Roma, 1952.
II. Delogu , (Tullio), La loi penale et son applications, Alexandria, 1956.
III. Saleilles : L’individualisation de la peine, paris, 1927.
IV. Marjori Bell- parol in principle and practice- New York, 1967
V. United Nations, ''Prison incident management handbook'', 2013.
VI. Bouzat, (pierre) et pinatel (jean): trait, de droit penal et de criminologie, Tom I, droit de penal, general, pear Bouzat, Paris- 1963-p636.
VII. Cristian Nils, Ia participation du juge a I application des sanctions penale, These, Geneve, 1974.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
