The idea of Silence Right in Period of Contractual Negotiation Study in the Anglo-American legal system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v33is.170Keywords:
المفاوضات العقدية, النظام القانوني الأنكلوأمريكيAbstract
The period of negotiations is essential in the formation of contracts especially economic importance, but the legal value varies from legal system to another, where the freedom of negotiation is absolute in the Anglo-American system, which leaves its impact on the duty of the flags regarding the principle of good faith in the stage of negotiations nodal.
The Anglo-American legal system recognizes the rule of the right to remain silent. The buyer's responsibility at the negotiation stage is that it rejects the principle of good faith at this stage, and then attempts to achieve justice through other mechanisms surrounding the principle. A number of exceptions are broadly decided to the degree Can be said to be working to achieve the same objectives of the principle.
Downloads
References
I. د. بخيت عيسى , اثار العولمة على المسؤولية السابقة على التعاقد , مجلة الاكاديمية للدراسات الاجتماعية والانسانية , الجزائر , العدد 14 , حزيران , 2015 .
II. د. بلال عبد المطلب بدوي , مبدأ حسن النية في مرحلة المفاوضات قبل التعاقدية في عقود التجارة , الدولية , اطروحة دكتوراه , كلية الحقوق , جامعة عين شمس , 2001.
III. د. حياة محمد محمد ابو النجا , الالتزام بالتفاوض في عقود التجارة الدولية ,اطروحة دكتوراه , كلية الحقوق , جامعة المنصورة , 2004 .
IV. د. سعد بن سعيد الذيابي , مبدأ حسن النية في النظام السعودي والانظمة المقارنة , مجلة الشريعة , والأنظمة جامعة تبوك , المملكة العربية السعودية , العدد(13) شباط 2014 .
V. د. صبري حمد خاطر, قطع المفاوضات العقدية,مجلة جامعة النهرين , كلية القانون , مج (11), العدد الثالث ,1997.
VI. د. عبد الحليم عبد اللطيف القوني , حسن النية وأثره في التصرفات في الفقه الاسلامي والقانون المدني , دار المطبوعات الجامعية , القاهرة , 2010.
VII. د. عبد المنعم فرج الصدة , أصول القانون, دار النهضة العربية, بيروت , بلا سنة الطبع.
VIII. د. مصطفى محمد الجمال , النظرية العامة للالتزامات , الدار الجامعية , المكتبة القانونية , 1987.
IX. د. معتز نزيه محمد الصادق المهدي , المتعاقد المحترف , دار النهضة العربية , 2009.
X. د. هاني صلاح سري الدين , المفاوضات في العقود التجارية الدولية , دراسة مقارنة في القانونين المصري والإنكليزي , مجلة أتحاد الجامعات العربية للدراسات والبحوث القانونية , كلية الحقوق , جامعة القاهرة , العدد الرابع , تشرين الأول , 1996.
XI. د. وائل حمدي احمد , حسن النية في البيوع الدولية , دار المطبوعات الجامعية,2012 .
ثانيا : المراجع باللغة الإنكليزية.
I. Alyona N. Kucher. Pre- contractual liability: protecting the rights of the parties engaged in negotiations.
II. A.M.Musy. Disclosure Of Information In the Pre – Contractual Bargaining . A Comparative Analysis.1995.
III. Andrew Tulloch . Utmost good Faith CMl Yearbook . 2003.
IV. Gabrried Marty et Pierre Raynaud. Droit Civil. tome II, I volume. Les Obligations. Paris. by Librairie du Recueil Sirey. 1962.
V. Matthew Harper. The implied duty of good faith in Australian contract law. 2004.
VI. Nicola W. Palmieri. Good Faith Dis closure Required During precontractual Negotiations. 1993.
VII. Omri Ben – Shahar. Freedom From Contract.
VIII. Powell R. good faith in contract. 1956.
IX. Roy Good. The concept of good faith in English law.
X. Stapleton j. good faith in private law. 1999.
XI. Walter H. Hamiltor . The Ancient Maxim Caveat Emptor, 1931.
XII. William Tetley. Good Faith in Contract Particularly in the Contracts of Arbitration and Chartering. 2004.
XIII. William L. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts. 1971.
ثالثا :- المراجع باللغة الفرنسية.
I. X. THUNIS. L’ obligation Precontractuelle d’information. 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
