Factors Affecting the U.S Supreme Court’s Reversal of Its Constitutional Precedents

Authors

  • قصي علي عباس, م.د. College of Law/ Alnahrain University
  • حسين جبر حسين الشويلي, أ.م.د. Law College/ Al Iraqiya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v35i2.329

Keywords:

Judicial Review, Judicial Precedence, Originalism, Pragmatism

Abstract

  1. S. Supreme Court plays a very important rule in American legal system, especially in the domain of constitutional interpretation and judicial review. This importance emerges from the precedents of the court which considered as compulsory rules on all the authorities. However, the supreme court can overrule its precedents. This research is about the factors which effect the court’s decision on overruling, dividing them on internal and external factors.

          The source of the internal factors is the precedent itself, while the source of the external factors is the circumstances surrounding the precedent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

المصادر العربية أولا-
I. د. حسين جبر حسين الشويلي , قرينة دستورية التشريع- دراسة مقارنة, منشورات الحلبي الحقوقية, بيروت, 2018.
II. د. هديل محمد حسن المياحي, العدول في احكام القضاء الدستوري في العراق- دراسة مقارنة, اطروحة دكنوراه مقدمة الى كلية الحقوق في جامعة النهرين

ثانيا – المصادر الانكليزية
I. Arthur A. Goodhart, Determining the Ratio decidendi of a Case, Yale Law Journal, Vol XL No.2, 1930
II. Barry Cushman, Teaching the Lochner Era, Saint Louis University Law Journal, Volume 62, 2018.
III. Brandon J. Murrill, The Supreme Court’s Overruling of Constitutional Precedent, Congressional Research Service, Updated September 24, 2018
IV. Daniel J. Solove – The Darkest Domain : Deference ,Judicial Review and the Bill of Rights – 84 Iowa Law Review ,941 – 1999.
V. David A. Strauss, The Living Constitution , Oxford University Press, 2010
VI. John Vile, Essential Supreme Court Decisions, Roman INC, 2010
VII. Jonathan O Neill , Originalism in American Law and Politics – A Constitutional History , The Johns Hopkins University Press , Baltimore- Maryland , U.S.A. , 2007
VIII. Lauren Vicki Stark, The Unworkable Unworkably Test, New York University Law Review, Volume 80, 2005
IX. Michael J. Gerhardt, The Role of Precedent in Constitutional Decisionmaking and Theory, The George Washington Law Review, 1991.
X. Michael Stokes Plausen, Does the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis ?, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 85, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-10

How to Cite

عباس قصي علي, and الشويلي حسين جبر حسين. 2021. “Factors Affecting the U.S Supreme Court’s Reversal of Its Constitutional Precedents”. Journal of Legal Sciences 35 (2): 167-96. https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v35i2.329.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 83

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.