The sanction for breaching the promise of the contract in view of the amendment of the French Civil Code by Decree No. 131 of 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v36i3.477Keywords:
الوعد بالتعاقد, الاخلال بالوعد, تعديل القانون المدني الفرنسيAbstract
Breach of the promise to contract and the penalty resulting from this breach is one of the important topics that occupied a wide space of interest in civil law jurisprudence when studying the subject of the promise to contract, and this importance did not disappear from the mind of the judiciary, so it was present in its decisions. This importance is due to the specificity of the promise to contract, despite being a contract Like other contracts, the breach of it is characterized by a special nature, as it may take place before the stage of expressing the desire on the part of the one who is promised, and it may be after expressing that desire. Based on this importance, the penalty for breaching the contract promise will be the subject of this research.
Downloads
References
I. اسماعيل غانم ، النظرية العامة للالتزام ، مصادر الالتزام، القاهرة ،مكتبة عبدالله وهبة، سنة 1966.
II. سعيد السيد قنديل، الوعد بالعقد بين اجتهاد الفقه وتطويع القضاء،مصر، الاسكندرية، مطبعة دار الجامعة الجديدة، سنة 2014.
III. سليمان مرقس، شرح القانون المدني العقود المسماة الجزء 3 المجلد الأول عقد البيع ، القاهرة ، عالم الكتب، سنة 1980 الطبعة الرابعة.
IV. عبد الرزاق احمد السنهوري ، الوسيط في شرح القانون المدني الجديد، الجزءالرابع (العقود التي ترد على الملكية البيع والمقايضة) ، القاهرة ، مطبعة نهضة مصر، سنة 2011 .
V. عبد الرزاق احمد السنهوري، الوسيط في شرح القانون المدني الجديد ، الجزء الاول المجلد الاول (نظرية الالتزام بوجه عام مصادر الالتزام) ،القاهرة، مطبعة نهضة مصر، سنة2011
VI. عبد المجيد الحكيم، عبد الباقي البكري، محمد طه البشير، الوجيز في نظرية الإلتزام في القانون المدني العراقي ، الجزء الأول في مصادر الإلتزام ، بغداد ، المكتبة القانونية ، 2017/2018.
VII. محمد كامل مرسي، شرح القانون المدني العقود المسماة عقد البيع والمقايضة الجزء السادس ، القاهرة ، منشأة المعارف ، سنة 2005.
VIII. محمود السيد عبد المعطي خيال، الوعد بالعقد، القاهرة،دار النهضة العربية ، سنة 1994.
IX. محمود جمال الدين زكي، مشكلات المسؤولية المدنية، الجزء الاول، القاهرة، سنة 1990،
X. مصطفى الجمال، شرح أحكام القانون المدني، مصادر الالتزام، بيروت، مؤسسة المعارف للطباعة والنشر، سنة 1991
ثانياً: المصادر باللغة الفرنسية
I. Baudry - La continerie et Léo Saignat : Traité , théorique et pratique de droit civil , T. 2 , Paris 1900 , p . 38 No 60
II. Benjamin Attias , L'inefficacité de la promesse unilatérale de contrat, AJ contrat 2020 p.23
III. Ch. Beudant, Cours de droit civil français 2e éd. 1938 publier par Rebert Beudant, T. XI, La Vente. Le Louage des choses, n° 4e, P. 31
IV. De l'inconstitutionnalité de l'exécution forcée des promesses unilatérales de vente Dernière plaidoirie avant adoption du projet de réforme du droit des contrats Recueil Dalloz 2015 p.826
V. Demogue, Traité des obligations En Genral ,II Effect des Obligation, Paris, 1938 T.VII, n° 1176, pp. 599 ets
VI. Francoise Benac-Schmidt, Le contrat de promesse unilaterale de vente, Paris, 1983.no 103, p. 88.
VII. Geninet Théorie générale des avant - contrats en droit privé, Thèse Paris, 1985 no928 etS.
VIII. Hugo Barbier, L'irrévocabilité de la promesse únilatérale de vente est conforme à la Constitution RID Civ. RID Civ. 2019 p.851.
IX. Ibrahim Najjar ,La sanction de la promesse de contrat Ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016, Recueil Dalloz 2016 p.848
X. Joanna Schmidt, Negociation et Conclusion de Contrat,Paris, Dalloz,1982
XI. Laura Sautonie-Laguionie ,Proposition de modification des articles 1123 et 1124 du Code civil: supprimer l'antinomie avec l'articie 1341- 2 du Code civil, RDC 2017. n' 114a3. p. 172
XII. Muriel Fabre-Magnan ,Droit des Obligation , 1 Contrat des obligations ,Paris , PUF,5 edition,2019
XIII. Muriel Fabre-Magnan De l'inconstitutionnalité de l'exécution forcée des promesses unilatérales de vente Dernière plaidoirie avant adoption du projet de réforme du droit des contrats Recueil Dalloz 2015 p.826
XIV. Planiol, et Ripert et Boulanger: Traité élémentaire de droit civil T. 2 no 1400
XV. Renaud mortier , Révocation en question: comment adapter l'article 1124 du Code civil aux promesses unilatérales de contrat assorties d'une fenêtre de levée d'option ? La Semaine Juridique Notariale et Immobilière n° 5, 31 Janvier 2020, 1033
XVI. V. GROSLIERES ET C. SAINT- ALARY-HOUIN: Note sous cass. ler civ., 24 janvier 1995, RD imm., 1995, p.342 et s.
ثالثاً: القرارات القضائية الفرنسية
I. Cass civ 13Juill2017 no16-17.625
II. Cass soc 21 sept 2017 no16-20.103
III. Cass Civ. 3°, 17 oct. 2019, n° 19-40.028 QPC
IV. Cass.civ 3e.15 dec 1993no 91-10.199.
V. Cass.civ 3e.27 Mars2008no 07-11.721.
VI. Cass.3e, civ20Fever1979,no 77-14.237
VII. Cass Civ, 3e, 10 Nov 1982
VIII. Cass Civ, 10 Avr1948
IX. Cass Civ. 3e, 8 Juill , 1975: Bull civ. II, n 249
رابعاً: المواقع الالكترونية
I. www.iraqidevelopers.com
II. www.legifrance.gouv.fr
III. www.labase-lextenso.fr
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
