The Formation of the Legal Faculty and its Application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/8t5xy421Keywords:
Legal thinking, Assumptions, Requirements, Components of the legal faculty, field of application, facts, lawAbstract
The sound legal thinking that reaches sound legal results is the basis of the legal faculty that is defined as: the faculty of the legal person to understand the legal language verbally and meaningfully and coexist in it and deal with it and realize and choose what words it can from it when needed during work and professional dealing, but this thinking does not have a methodology in specific and specific jurisprudence, as the faculty does not have a fixed size or a certain limit, but is flexible and expands It grows as its owner fills it with legal information and practical experience. The legal faculty has not been regulated by the legislator, in addition to the fact that the judiciary and jurisprudence have not dealt with this by expressing their jurisprudence in this context.
Therefore, these problems oblige us to solve them to contribute to clarifying their assumptions and indicating their requirements, elements and components on the one hand, and then determine the field of application on the other hand, by following an analytical approach and a plan consisting of two sections: the first of which is the assumptions of the legal faculty and its requirements and the statement of its elements and components, and the second is the field of application to facts and law.
Downloads
References
First: Book:
A) References of Islamic jurisprudence:
I. Al-Juwayni, Al-Burhan, year 1418 AH, in the principles of jurisprudence, edited by Abdul-Azim Muhammad Al-Deeb, Dar Al-Wafa, Egypt, fourth edition.
II. Al-Razi, Muhammad bin Abi Bakr, 1993 AD, Mukhtar Al-Sahhah, second edition, Lebanon Library, Beirut.
III. Al-Sama’ani, year 1997 AD, Qawati’ al-Adha fi al-Usul 2/92, edited by Muhammad Hassan Ismail al-Shafi’i, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, first edition.
IV. Al-Adawi, on Upper Egypt, in the year 1412 AH - 1991 AD, Al-Adawi’s footnote to explaining the sufficiency of the divine student, edited by Youssef Sheikh Muhammad Al-Baqa’i, Dar Al-Fikr - Beirut.
V. Al-Razi, Muhammad bin Bakr bin Abdul Qadir, 1983, Mukhtar Al-Sahah, Printing and Publishing House, Kuwait.
VI. Shabir, Muhammad Othman, 1999, The Book of the Nation, Formation of the Jurisprudential Queen, first edition, Presidency of Sharia Courts and Religious Affairs, Qatar.
VII. Al-Shawkani, Muhammad Ali, year 1412 AH/1992 AD, Irshad Al-Fahul, edited by Muhammad Saeed Al-Badri, Dar Al-Fikr - Beirut, first edition.
b) Legal references:
I. Madani, Ahmadouche, 2015, Al-Wajeez fi Legal Research Methodology, Fez, Morocco.
II. Bassiouni, Hassan Al-Sayed, 2000, Judicial Work Methodology, New Rose Al-Youssef Press, Cairo.
III. Al-Jumaili, Khaled Rashid, 1989, Introduction to the Study of Islamic Sharia and Law, Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing, Baghdad.
IV. Abdullah, Khudair Munir, 2011, The Jurisprudential Faculty and its Formation Factors in Teaching Jurisprudence of Contemporary Issues, Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University, Riyadh.
V. Mahmoud, Sayed Ahmed, The Role of the Pleader and the Lawyer in the Judicial System, Dar Al-Fikr and Law, Mansoura, 2015.
VI. Mahmoud, Sayed Ahmed, 2009 edition, The Role of the Lawyer in the Judicial System, Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya, Cairo, 2007 edition.
VII. Mahmoud, Sayed Ahmed, 2007, The Role of the Lawyer in the Judicial System, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo.
VIII. Badawi, Abdul Rahman, 1997, Scientific Research Methods, sixth edition, Publications Agency, Kuwait.
IX. Marah, Ali, 2004, Methodology of Legal Thinking (Theoretically and Practical), Books and Publications Forum, University Press Office, Algeria.
X. Bouhosh, Ammar, Al -Thunaibat, Mohamed Mahmoud, 1989, curricula of scientific research and methods of preparing research, Dar Al -Yazouri, Amman.
XI. Mega, Muhammad Hamad Kenan, 2008, Deduction from the text, its conditions and controls, Muhammadiyah Association of Scholars (Morocco).
XII. Abdel Rahman, Muhammad Saeed, 2011, Judicial ruling, its elements and rules for issuing, Al-Halabi Publications, Beirut.
XIII. Al-Saqqa, Mahmoud, 1998, A Study in Legal Logic, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo.
XIV. Mansour, Mansour Mustafa, 1970, Introduction to Legal Sciences, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Arabi Press, Cairo.
XV. Allam, Wael Ahmed, 2015, Legal Research Methods, University Library, Sharjah.
Second: Research, articles, and lectures:
I. Abdel Ghafour, Ibrahim, Reasoning for Judicial Rulings
II. Saqr, Ahmed Haji, 2019, Muhammad Ammar Turkmaniyah Ghazal, Al-Hajjaj’s Legal Tools and Techniques: Judgments in Qatari Courts as an Example, p. 12.
III. Al Suwaidi, Ahmed Saeed Bin Hazim, The Concept of Knowledge Management, his article published on the Dubai Courts government website.
IV. Dehomme, Ahmed Ali, 2017, Introduction to the Study of Legal Logic, Faculty of Law Journal for Legal and Economic Research, Rights - Issue 2, Volume Four.
V. Al-Kordofany, Amal, language and method of legal thinking.
VI. Al-Hussein Ait Saeed, 2005, Principles of Reasoning According to Imam Malik, Al-Wadha Magazine, Dar Al-Hadith Al-Hassaniyah, Marrakesh, Morocco, Issue 3, Principles of Art in Drafting Legal Memorandums.
VII. Al-Kuraiti, Haider Hussein, 2018, The relationship between law colleges and Iraqi courts and its implications for the preparation of legal cadres, Kufa Journal of Legal and Political Sciences (Issue 13/2).
VIII. Ayesh, Rami, and (others), “The Shadow Lawyer...” The Weakness of the Nobility’s Profession, an article published in Al-Bayan newspaper, issue No. 13368 dated 11/23/2017.
IX. Al-Samghouli, Rashid, 2018, The faculty of jurisprudence, its components and methods for acquiring it, his research published in Al-Quds Open University Journal for Human Research, Issue 45, June.
X. Abdul Samad, Sarah, 2020, The role of epistemology in developing legal thought, legal facts magazine, Volume 2 No. 6, publisher Zakaria Al -Ammari.
XI. Ali, Atef Saadi Muhammad, 2017 edition, Skills for Using Legal Language in the Field of Legislation and Legal Opinions, Arab Journal of Jurisprudence and Judiciary.
XII. Al-Muttaqi, Abdel-Al, June 2007, The inductive approach according to Imam Al-Shatibi, a published article (Diwan Al-Arab).
XIII. Fathawi, Abdul Aziz, 2011, Methodology for issuing judgments in accordance with the UAE Civil Procedure Law, Center for Jurisprudential, Legislative and Judicial Research and Studies, Emirate of Abu Dhabi, Judicial Department, first edition.
XIV. Al-Harishi, Abdul Latif, The Legal Queen’s Essay (An Attempt to Meditate)
XV. Al-Khafaji, Aziz, 2018, Notes on teaching law and developing its curricula in Iraqi universities, Kufa Journal of Legal and Political Sciences (Issue 9/1), 2012 edition, pp. 3, 15-16 - Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Saad Al Khanin, Downloading rulings on judicial facts Al-Fatwa, 1st edition.
XVI. Mega, Muhammad Hamad Kenan, 2008, Deduction from the Text - Its Conditions and Controls, Symposium on Methods of Derivation from Revelation, Muhammadiyah Association of Scholars, Rabat, Morocco.
XVII. Al-Ahmad, Muhammad Suleiman, 2013, Occam’s Razor rule and its role in forming a sound legal faculty, an analytical study in the philosophy of law, Tikrit University Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, Volume 1, Year 5, Issue 19.
XVIII. Shabir, Muhammad Othman, 1999, Formation of the jurisprudential faculty among students of Islamic jurisprudence, Principles of Jurisprudence and its Rules, Shawwal 27, 1428 (11/08/2007), research presented at the second conference entitled Teaching Islamic Jurisprudence in Universities (Reality and Law), Zarqa University Al-Ahliyya - College of Sharia.
XIX. Obaid, Mustafa Fouad, the legal queen...and the other queens!!
XX. Al-Najjar, Heba, The Difference Between Induction and Deduction, Arab Information Network (Your Library).
XXI. Ragheb, Wajdi, January 1976, Studies on the Adversary’s Status Before the Civil Judiciary, Journal of Legal and Economic Sciences, Year 18, First Issue.
XXII. Othman, Walid, developing the legal competence of the lawyer, under the umbrella of the Judicial Training Center in Saudi Arabia, his lecture on YouTube.
Third: - Websites and electronic links:
I. https://elkanoon.wordpress.com Various sciences www.eastlaws.com East Laws
II. https://www.law-arab.com/2015/07/Legal-Privy-Definition.htm Arab Law
III. https://s-alamri.com Sheikh Ibrahim Al-Omari’s website
IV. https://www.aleqt.com/2015/08/27/article_985560.html Al-Eqtisadiah newspaper https://iamaeg.net/ar/publications/articles/top-10-skills-for-lawyers International Mediation Academy
V. https://kenanaonline.com/users/doctorzakaria/posts/136929Kenana Online
VI. https://www.dc.gov.ae/PublicServices/websitefiles/Publications/Knowledge_Management_AR_2012.pdf Dubai Courts
VII. http://www.labodroit.com/ Legal Laboratory Journal
VIII. https://alantologia.com/blogs/13015 Ontology
IX. https://qawaneen.blogspot.com/2020/05/blog-post_3.html Blog of statutory laws
X. https://www.maktabtk.com/blog/post/1022 Your library website
XI. http://www.alwarraq.com Alwarraq website https://ar.wikipedia.org Wikipedia
XII. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmOhpI8mFaI YouTube
XIII. https://www.facebook.com/1438100302912691/posts/2325348954187817/ Facebook (Ibrahim Abdel Ghafour page)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
