The Influence of Early analytic Philosophy on Kelsen's Pure Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/0h395b20Keywords:
Hans Kelsen, Legal positivism, Gottlob Frege, Analytic philosophy, Pure theory, Legal normsAbstract
Hans Kelsen's account of legal positivism is unique in various respects, first in its logicist approach to legal facts. Kelsen has been recognized as the first jurist to have attempted to reduce law to pure logic of norms, distinct from truth-value propositional logic. Moreover, he introduced the entity of legal meaning as an abstract object distinct from a proposition as a meaning-bearing entity in propositional logic.
Second, Kelsen invented the doctrine of "basic norm" and presented it as a necessary condition for the existence of legal discourse. The doctrine serves two functions: it gives logical unity to a legal system and solves the problem of infinite regress by alienating psychological elements from the law.
Thirdly, he started what might be considered the linguistic turn in legal philosophy. Indeed, linguistic analysis of legal concepts and statements has become prevalent among legal positivists after Kelsen. The Hartian project may be considered a revision of Kelsen's thesis in light of the earlier accounts of legal positivism and ordinary language philosophy within the analytic philosophy tradition.
The distinctive features of Kelsen's positivism and his innovative approach to the logic of legal norms are very similar to the rigid methodologies taken by early analytic philosophers toward logical and mathematical facts. Thus, the hypothesis under investigation in this article is that early analytic philosophy was in Kelsen's intellectual background while he worked on his pure theory of law. The hypothesis relies on several similarities between Kelsen's theory of pure law and the approach of early analytical philosophy in terms of motivation, methodology, and aims.
The research was divided into three parts: The first discussed the nature of universal relations in law and their importance as necessary conditions for the existence of the legal system and legal discourse. The second section introduces the reader to the early analytic philosophy, its most important intellectual figures, methodologies, and main themes. Lastly, the article concludes by discussing the main findings and critique of the research hypothesis.
Downloads
References
A- Books and Scientific Journal:
I. Abdulaziz Rekah, Kelsen’s Basic Norm: Between positive foundation and transcendental interpretation, Journal of legal and political research, 7 No 2 (2021)
II. Abdulrazak Alsunhuri, Alwaseet in interpreting civil code, 1 (Beirut, Dar Ihia'a Alturath Al-Arabi, 1970)
III. Abdulrazak Alsunhuri, Legal facts and legal transactions, ( Cairo, Parliament publications, 1952).
IV. Alkholy, Abdullah. "The Logical Completeness of Legal Facts in the Modern Jurisprudence A Comparative Analytical Study." LARK JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY, LINGUISTICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 1, no. 44 (2022).
V. Ahmed shaker, Al-Shafi'i's Risala (Beirut, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiah,).
VI. Aristotle and Hugh Tredennick, 1933. The Metaphysics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
VII. Atkinson, Ronald F. "Hume on mathematics." The Philosophical Quarterly (1950) 10, no. 39 (1960).
VIII. Austin John. 1832. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. London: J. Murray.
IX. Austin, John. "The Province of Jurisprudence Defined." Jurist QJ Juris. & Legis. 3 (1832).
X. Austin, John. Austin: the province of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge University Press, 1995; Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus, and Leslie Green. The concept of law. oxford university press, 2012.
XI. Ayer, Alfred Jules. Language, truth, and logic. Vol. 10. Courier Corporation, 1952.
XII. Becker, Gary S. "Crime and punishment: An economic approach." Journal of political economy 76, no. 2 (1968).
XIII. Bentham, Jeremy. "Of the principle of utility." Ethics 20.4 (1994).
XIV. Bentham, Jeremy. The collected works of Jeremy Bentham: An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press, 1996.
XV. Bix, Brian H. "Kelsen in the United States: Still Misunderstood." Hans Kelsen in America-Selective Affinities and the Mysteries of Academic Influence (2016), PP. 22.
XVI. Brockhaus, Richard R. "Realism and psychologism in 19th century logic." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51, no. 3 (1991)
XVII. Bulygin, Eugenio. "Norms and logic: Kelsen and Weinberger on the ontology of norms." Law § Phil. 4 (1985)
XVIII. Buroker, Jill Vance. Kant's' Critique of Pure Reason': An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
XIX. Ciabattoni, Agata, Xavier Parent, and Giovanni Sartor. "A Kelsenian Deontic Logic." In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 141-150. IOS Press, 2021.
XX. Cooper, John M., and Douglas S. Hutchinson, eds. Plato: complete works. Hackett Publishing, 1997.
XXI. Daly, Cahal Brendan. "Logical Positivism, Metaphysics and Ethics: I. Ludwig Wittgenstein." Irish Theological Quarterly 23.2 (1956).
XXII. Dejnozka, Jan. "Frege on identity." International Studies in Philosophy 13, no. 1 (1981).
XXIII. Dore Isaak I. 2007. The Epistemological Foundations of Law: Readings and Commentary. Durham N.C: Carolina Academic Press.
XXIV. Dummett, Michael. "Frege: Philosophy of Language." (1973).
XXV. Dyzenhaus, David, and Malcolm Thorburn, eds. Philosophical foundations of constitutional law. Oxford University Press, 2016.
XXVI. Epistemological Foundations of Law: Readings and Commentary. Durham N.C: Carolina Academic Press.
XXVII. Fine, Gail, "Third Man Arguments", On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms (Oxford, 1995).
XXVIII. Fine, Gail. On ideas: Aristotle's criticism of Plato's theory of forms. Clarendon Press, 1993.
XXIX. Frege, Gottlob. "Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought." From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic 1931 (1879).
XXX. FREGE, GOTTLOB. "SENSE AND REFERENCE." The Philosophical Review 57, no. 3 (1948).
XXXI. Frege, Gottlob. "The thought: A logical inquiry." Mind 65. 259 (1956).
XXXII. Frege, Gottlob. The basic laws of arithmetic. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
XXXIII. Friedman, Michael. "Kant on geometry and spatial intuition." Synthese 186 (2012).
XXXIV. Gary, Hatfield. "Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Descartes and the Meditations." (2003).
XXXV. Gianformaggio, Letizia. "Hans Kelsen on the deduction of validity." Rechtstheorie 21 (1990)
XXXVI. Green, Michael S. "12 Hans Kelsen's Non-Reductive Positivism." The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (2021).
XXXVII. Green, Michael Steven. "Hans Kelsen and the logic of legal systems." Ala. L. Rev. 54 (2002).
XXXVIII. Hameda Mahkos, Bernard Russell's Logisim and the crisis of the foundation of mathematics, Doctoral dissertation, Algeria, 2005.
XXXIX. Hans Kelsen and Akram Al-Watary, The pure theory of law, (Iraq, Center for legal studies, 1986).
XL. Hart H. L. A Joseph Raz and Penelope A Bulloch. 2012. The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
XLI. Holmes, Oliver Wendell. "The path of the law." Harvard Law Review 110, no. 5 (1997).
XLII. Horty, John F. "Frege on the psychological significance of definitions." Philosophical studies 72 (1993).
XLIII. Hume David and L. A Selby-Bigge. 19571902. Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, IV.
XLIV. Hume David. 2004. A Treatise of Human Nature. Mineola N.Y: Dover, 50-51.
XLV. Hume, David. "An enquiry concerning human understanding." In Seven masterpieces of philosophy, pp. 183-276. Routledge, 2016.
XLVI. Jabloner, Clemens. "Kelsen and his circle: the Viennese years." European Journal of International Law 9.2 (1998).
XLVII. Kant Immanuel Allen W Wood and J. B Schneewind. 2002. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New Haven: Yale University Press.
XLVIII. Kant Immanuel. 2004. Critique of Practical Reason. Mineola NY: Dover Publications.
XLIX. Kaplan, Jeffrey. "The Internal Point of View." Law and Philosophy 42.3 (2023): 211-236; Raz, Joseph. Practical reason and norms. OUP Oxford, 1999.
L. Kelsen Hans. 2005. Pure Theory of Law. Clark N.J: Lawbook Exchange.
LI. Kelsen Hans. 2007. General Theory of Law and State. Clark N.J: Lawbook Exchange.
LII. Kelsen, Hans. Essays in legal and moral philosophy. Vol. 57. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
LIII. Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.
LIV. Kemeny, John G. "WV Quine. Two dogmas of empiricism. The philosophical review, vol. 60 (1951), pp. 20–43." The Journal of Symbolic Logic 17, no. 4 (1952).
LV. Keyt, David. "Wittgenstein's Picture Theory of language." Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Routledge, 2013.
LVI. Kohnke, Klaus Christian. "The rise of neo-Kantianism: German academic philosophy between idealism and positivism." (1991).
LVII. Leiter, Brian, and Alex Langlinais. "The Methodology of legal philosophy." (2012).
LVIII. Maier, Pauline. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. Bantam Classics, 2008.
LIX. McKeon, Richard, ed. The basic works of Aristotle. Modern Library, 2009.
LX. Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: 1. Vol. 1. Parker, 1856.
LXI. Mumford, Stephen, and Stephen Mumford. Russell on Metaphysics: Selections from the Writings of Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge, 2003.
LXII. Paulson, Stanley L. "Hans Kelsen on legal interpretation, legal cognition, and legal science." Jurisprudence 10, no. 2 (2019).
LXIII. Paulson, Stanley L. "Hans Kelsen's Doctrine of Imputation." Ratio Juris, vol. 14, no. 1, 2001.
LXIV. Paulson, Stanley L. "Kelsen's Legal Theory: The Final Round." Oxford J. Legal Stud. 12 (1992).
LXV. Paulson, Stanley L. "The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law." Oxford J. Legal Stud. 12 (1992).
LXVI. Pelletier, Francis J., Renée Elio, and Philip Hanson. "Is logic all in our heads? From naturalism to Psychologism." Studia Logica 88 (2008).
LXVII. Plato, Plato John M Cooper and D. S Hutchinson. 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis Ind: Hackett.
LXVIII. Posner Richard A. 1986. Economic Analysis of Law 3Rd ed. [4th print.] ed. Boston: Little Brown.
LXIX. Quine, W. V. "TWO DOGMAS OF EMPIRICISM'." The Philosophical Review 60.1 (1951).
LXX. Raz Joseph. 2009. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LXXI. Raz, Joseph. "Agency, reason, and the good." Philosophy of Action: An Anthology (2015).
LXXII. Raz, Joseph. "HLA Hart (1907–1992)." Utilitas 5, no. 2 (1993).
LXXIII. Raz, Joseph. "Kelsen's Theory of the Basic Norm." Am. J. Juris. 19 (1974): PP. 94-97.
LXXIV. Richard A. Posner, "An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law," Columbia Law Review 85, no. 6 (October 1985).
LXXV. Russell, Bertrand. "Letter to Frege." From Frege to Gödel (1902): 124-125.
LXXVI. Russell, Bertrand. History of western philosophy. Routledge, 2004.
LXXVII. Rutherford, Donald. "Descartes’ ethics." (2003).
LXXVIII. Searle, John R. "Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts." The philosophical review 77, no. 4 (1968).
LXXIX. Von Wright, Georg Henrik. "Deontic logic and the theory of conditions." In Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1971.
LXXX. Weiner, Joan. "Frege and the linguistic turn." Philosophical Topics 25, no. 2 (1997): 265-288.
LXXXI. Wright, Georg Henrik von. "Is there a logic of norms?" Ratio Juris 4.3 (1991).
LXXXII. Zalta, Edward N. "Frege’s Theorem and Foundations for Arithmetic." (1998).
B- Miscellaneous:
I. The French constitution of 1791.
II. US declaration of independence, 1776.
III. Axiom of comprehension. Oxford Reference.
IV. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopedia. "Protocol sentence". Encyclopedia Britannica, 1 Apr. 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
