Guarantees for the Implementation of Administrative Judiciary Rulings in the Face of the Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/wescf987Keywords:
Guarantees, Administrative Justice, Abstention, Authority Of The Judge, ns of Reparation of the AdministrationAbstract
Guarantees for the execution of judicial judgments are represented in cases where administrative authorities refuse to execute the judgments of administrative courts, explicit or incomplete refusal of the judgment, fraud or non-accurate execution of the judgment, and obstructing the execution of the judgment by individual administrative decisions or legislation issued. The main problem is that the guarantees for the execution of judicial decisions issued by the Egyptian administrative courts are insufficient, as the existing traditional guarantees are still insufficient; in addition, the extent of commitment of the administrative authorities to implement the decisions is insufficient. The main purpose of the study is to demonstrate the guarantees for the implementation of administrative sentences, by showing the extent of its impact on the failure to achieve the purpose required for issuing a judicial sentence, as well as the need to urge the Egyptian legislator to adopt the modern guarantees of issuing judicial orders to the executive authority and the threat of fines used in French law. The study was divided into two sections, in the first section we discussed the cases in which the administration refrains from implementing the judgments of the administrative courts, by clarifying the cases in which the administration refrains from implementing the judgments of the administrative courts in the first request, then the extent of the administrative judge's authority to issue orders to the public administration as a second request, and in the second section we discussed the means of forcing the administration to implement the implementation of the administrative court judgments as a guarantee for the litigant in both France and Egypt in two requests.
This study found that the threatening fine is a legitimate means of coercion or coercion against the debtor in order to fulfill his obligation, as well as that the French legislator has violated the Egyptian legal system on the non-criminalization of refraining from executing judicial sentences
Downloads
References
First: References in Arabic
I. Muhammad Saeed Al-Laithi, The Administration’s Refusal to Implement Administrative Rulings Issued Against It “A Comparative Study”, Dar Al-Majd for Printing, Egypt, no publication date.
II. Bu Hadid Faris, The Public Administration’s Refusal to Implement Cancellation Rulings, “A Comparative Study”, 2016.
III. Hamdi Ali Omar, The Authority of the Administrative Judge to Issue Orders to the Administration, A Comparative Study, Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya, Cairo, 2003.
IV. Jalal Al Adwy, Principles of Obligation and Evidence Rulings, Mansha’at Al Maaref, Alexandria, 1996.
V. Abdel Hakim Fouda, Administrative Litigation, Annulment Suit Rulings and Their Model Forms, Dar Al Matbouat Al Jami’a, Alexandria, 1996.
VI. Abdel Raouf Hashem Bassiouni, Problems of Implementation in Administrative Judiciary Rulings, Dar Al Fikr Al Jami’a, Alexandria, 2007.
VII. Abdel Fattah Murad, Crimes of Refusal to Implement Rulings and Other Crimes of Refusal, Dar Al Kitab Wal Watha’iq, Egypt, no publication date.
VIII. Masoud Shihoub, General Principles of Administrative Disputes, Bodies and Procedures Before Them, Part Three, Diwan Al Matbouat Al Jami’a, 1999.
IX. Yasser Mohamed Al Asar, The Principle of Prohibiting the Issuance of Orders from The Administrative Judge of the Administration, and the Prohibition of His Replacement and His Modern Developments, A Comparative Study, Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya, Cairo, 2011.
X. Naguib Ahmed Abdullah Thabet Al-Jabali, Special Procedures for Compulsory Enforcement against the Administration, Modern Office, Alexandria, 2006.
Second: University Theses and Dissertations
XI. Al-Jubouri, Muhammad Tahseen Hussein, "Forms of Enforcement of Judicial Rulings Issued by Cancellation Against the Administration and Their Guarantees, A Comparative Study, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Al al-Bayt University, Jordan, 2020.
XII. Amani Fawzy Hamouda, Guarantees for Enforcement of Rulings Issued in Administrative Disputes, PhD Thesis, Assiut University, 2012.
XIII. Alaa Mahmoud Hussein Al-Sahtoot, Guarantees for the Implementation of Judicial Rulings Issued by Administrative Courts "Comparative Study, Master's Thesis, Middle East University, 2022.
XIV. Elias Youssef Al-Youssef, Powers of the Annulment Judge in Syrian Law, Comparative Study, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Damascus, 1978.
XV. Bouhali Mouloud, Guarantees for the Administration's Implementation of Administrative Judicial Rulings, Master's Thesis, 2012.
XVI. Ben Sawla Shafika, The Problem of the Administration's Implementation of Administrative Judicial Decisions, Comparative Study, Dar Houma for Printing, Publishing and Distribution, Algeria, 2010.
XVII. Tamam, Amal Yaish, Powers of the Administrative Judge in Issuing Orders to the Administration, Published PhD Thesis, University of Mohamed Kheder Biskra, Algeria, 2012.
XVIII. Hamdi Ali Omar, The Authority of the Administrative Judge in Issuing Orders to the Administration, Comparative Study, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo, 2003.
XIX. Jihad Daif Allah Diab Al-Jazi, New Means for Implementing Administrative Judicial Rulings, The French Experience Example, no publication date.
XX. Ramdani Farid, Implementation of Administrative Judicial Decisions and its Problems in Confronting the Administration, unpublished master's thesis, University of Hadj Lakhdar, Batna, Algeria, 2014
XXI. Abdel Moneim Abdel Azim Jira, Effects of the Cancellation Ruling, PhD thesis, Cairo University, 1970.
XXII. Abdel Qader Addou, Guarantees for the Implementation of Administrative Rulings Against the Public Administration, Dar Houma for Printing, Publishing and Distribution, Algeria, 2010.
XXIII. Zain El Abidine Belmahi, Legal Means to Ensure the Implementation of Administrative Judicial Decisions, unpublished master's thesis, University of Abu Bakr Belkaid, Tlemcen, Algeria, 2008.
XXIV. Saeed, Barwa Farouk, Administration's Refusal to Implement the Cancellation Ruling, Comparative Study, Published PhD Thesis, Yarmouk University, Jordan, no publication date.
XXV. Sahar Salem Mahmoud Al-Douri, The Effectiveness of Guarantees for the Implementation of Cancellation Rulings in Jordanian and Iraqi Law, 2019.
XXVI. Fatiha Hanish, Guarantees for the Implementation of Judicial Rulings and Decisions, Master's Thesis, University of Mohamed Khaider Biskra, 2013
XXVII. .
Third: Legal Journals and Research
XXVIII. Dr. Jihad Daif Allah Diab Al-Jazi, New Means for Implementing Administrative Judiciary Rulings, The French Experience as a Model, Journal of the Kuwait International Law School - Sixth Year - Issue 3 - Serial Issue 23 - Dhu al-Hijjah 1439 AH / Muharram 1440 AH - September 2018.
XXIX. Fawaz Saleh, The Legal System of the Penal Fine, A Comparative Legal Study, Damascus University Journal of Economic and Legal Sciences, Volume 28, Issue 2, 2012
XXX. Farida Meziani and Amna Sultani, The Principle of Prohibiting the Issuance of Orders by the Administrative Judge to the Administration and the Exceptions to It in the Civil and Administrative Procedures Law, Al-Mofaker Magazine, Issue 7, November 2011, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mohamed Khider, Biskra - Algeria.
XXXI. Laila Zerrougui, Powers of the Administrative Judge in Light of the Judicial Applications of the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court, Judges' Bulletin, National Office of Educational Works, Issue 4, Algeria, 1999.
XXXII. Mazen Lilo Radi, Means of Implementing Administrative Judgments, Journal of Law, Al-Mustansiriya University, Iraq, Volume 3, Issue 11, 12, 2010.
Fourth: Foreign References
XXXIII. Marie Christine Roualt, Administrative Law, Gualino Editor, 5th Edition, Paris, 2009.
XXXIV. Jaque Leger, Powers of Injunction and Assignment of the Administrative Judgment, State Council, International Seminar on Administrative Law, November 2005.
XXXV. Gilles Darcy, and Michel Paillet, content administrator, Armand Colin, Paris, 2000.
XXXVI. Rivero Jean, Le Huron at the Palais Royal, or naive reflexions on the results for the first time, Dalloz, 1962,
XXXVII. Olivier Gohin, content administrator.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
