Electronic Notification
A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/bvft1b27Keywords:
Judicial Notification, Electronic Means, Judicial paper, Legal validityAbstract
This research addresses the concept of electronic notification, its characteristics, and the electronic means used in its implementation, including what are the means and the conditions for their use. It also clarifies the nature of the judicial paper subject to notification, its characteristics, and the legal validity of electronic notification in terms of the conditions for acquiring such validity and verifying its accuracy. Comparative legislation has varied in adopting electronic notification; some, like Jordanian and French legislation, have embraced it comprehensively and extensively, while others, such as Egyptian and Iraqi legislation, have adopted it in a more limited scope. The researcher concluded with several findings and recommendations, the most important of which are: the significance of utilizing electronic means in judicial notification due to their speed, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness; the necessity of regulating this process through specific legislation aligned with its nature and intended purpose; and the need to provide sufficient safeguards to ensure the provision of accurate and reliable official information and data, guaranteeing the proper use of these means and the successful delivery of the notification document to the intended recipient, "The researchers also recommend that the Iraqi legislator issue a law regulating the provisions of this notification and benefit from the experiences of other countries, especially neighboring ones.
Downloads
References
First: Legal Books
i. Abbas Al-Aboudi. "Al-Tabli'gh al-Qudai' bi-Wasa'il Iliktruniya wa Dauruha fi Hasm al-Da'wa al-Madaniyya." Majalat al-Rafidain li al-Huquq (1977): 86.
ii. Abdel-Monem Al-Sharqawi. Al-Wujayz fi Qanun al-Murafa'at al-Madaniyya wa al-Tijariyya. Dar al-Nashr li al-Jami'at al-Misriyya, Cairo, 1951.
iii. Adam Wahib Lendawi. Falsafah Ijra'at al-Taqadi fi Qanun al-Murafa'at. 1st ed. University of Baghdad, 1988.
iv. Ahmed Abu Wafa. Al-Murafa'at al-Madaniyya wa al-Tijariyya bi-Miqdad Qanun al-Murafa'at wa al-Ithbat. Dar Al-Wafa' li al-Tiba'a, Egypt.
v. Ahmed Fathi Surour. Al-Waseet fi Sharh al-Ijra'at al-Janaiyya, Vol. 1. Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya, 1979.
vi. Ahmed Hindi. Qanun al-Murafa'at al-Madaniyya wa al-Tijariyya. Dar al-Jami'a al-Jadida, Egypt, 2020.
vii. Anwar Sultan. Qawa'id al-Ithbat fi al-Mawadi' al-Madaniyya wa al-Tijariyya. 2nd ed. Dar al-Jami'a al-Jadida, Alexandria, 2006.
viii. As'ad Fadhel Mandil. Al-Taqadi 'An Bu'ad – Dirasat Muqarana. University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq, 2014.
ix. Badr bin Abdullah Mohammed Al-Matroodi. "Ahkam al-Tabli'gh al-Qudai' al-Iliktruniya." Majalat al-Jami'a al-Islamiya 198 (1443 AH): 57.
x. Betool Ka'farani. Ilzam al-Qadi Nafsah bi-Mabda' al-Wajahiyya – Dirasat Muqarana. Master's Thesis, Arab University of Beirut, 2012.
xi. BLÉRY, Corinne; TEBOUL, Jean-Paul. La communication par voie électronique, de la procédure civile avant tout!. La Semaine Juridique, 2012, 46: 2022-2024.
xii. Dhif Allah Al-Khulaifat, and Mustafa Al-Hisban. Al-Ahkam al-Munazzima li al-Tabli'gh al-Qudai' al-Iliktruniya wa Fiqan al-Qanun al-Urduni wa al-Imarati - Dirasat Muqarana. Master's Thesis, University of Amman, 2024.
xiii. Faris Ali Omar Al-Jurjari. Al-Tabli'ghat al-Qudai'iyya wa Dauruha fi Hasm al-Da'wa al-Madaniyya. Maktabat al-Ma'arif, Alexandria, Egypt, 2007.
xiv. Fathi Wali. Al-Waseet fi Qanun al-Qada' al-Madani. Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya, Cairo, 1987
xv. Fawzi Abdel Hadi Al-Awadi. Al-Jawanib al-Qanuniyya li al-Barid al-Iliktruni. Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya, Cairo, 2005.
xvi. Hazem Al-Shar'ah. Al-Taqadi al-Iliktroni (Al-Mahakim al-Iliktroniya). Dar al-Thaqafa li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'ea, Amman, 2010.
xvii. Kamal Abdul Rahim Al-Alaween. "Al-Taqadi al-Iliktroni fi al-Dawa'i al-Huqukiyya fi al-Qanun al-Urduni / Mushkilat wa Hulul - Dirasat Muqarana wa Bahth." Mu'tamar Qadaya Qanuniyya Mustajida: Muraja'a 'Ilmiya li al-Tahadiyat al-'Amaliyya allati Tuwajah al-Dawla al-Mu'asira. College of Law, Kuwait University, Kuwait, 2023.
xviii. Keelyknapp,Comment,Service of process@Social media: Accepting Social Media for Service of process in the 21stCentury.74LA.Rev.547 (2014)at567.
xix. Maya Mustafa Fouladkar. Al-Nizam al-Qanuni li al-Tabli'gh al-Iliktruniya fi al-Tashri' al-Faransi. Dar al-Jami'a al-Jadida, Alexandria, 2020.
xx. Mohamed Mahmoud Ibrahim. Al-Wujayz fi al-Murafa'at. 2nd ed. Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, Cairo, 2001.
xxi. Mohammed Ibn Ahmad Al-Badairat. "Al-Tabli'gh al-Qudai' bi-Wasa'il Iliktruniya fi al-Nizam al-Sa'udi." Majalat al-Buḥuth al-Fiqhiyya wa al-Qanuniyya (2022).
xxii. Muhammad Fawaz Abdel Fattah Hamid, Provisions of Electronic Judicial Notification, Master’s Thesis, Middle East University, Jordan, 2011. Marwan Karkabi, Principles of Civil Trials and Arbitration, Al-Halabi Publications, Beirut, Part 1, Volume 1, 6th Edition, 2018Muntasir Habib Lamloum. Iliktroniya al-I'lan al-Qudai bi-Wasa'il al-Tiknulujiya. 1st ed. Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'ea, Egypt, 2024.
xxiii. Nour Akef Al-Dabas. "Ahkam al-Tabli'gh al-Qudai' al-Iliktruniya fi Qanun Usul al-Muhakamalat al-Madaniyya al-Urduni." Majalat al-Balqa li al-Buḥuth wa al-
xxiv. Wajdy Ragheb, Studies on the Adversary’s Status Before the Civil Judiciary, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Law, Journal of Economic and Legal Sciences, Volume 18, Issue 1, Egypt 1976.
xxv. Safaa Outani. "Al-Mahkama al-Iliktruniya (Al-Mafhum wa al-Tatbiq)." Majalat Jamiaat Dimashq li al-Uloom al-Iqtisadiyya wa al-Qanuniya 28, no. 2 (2012):
177.
xxix Zaqar Abdul Ghani, Electronic Editors, a memorandum submitted to complete the requirements for obtaining a master’s degree, University
Muhammad Al-Bashir Al-Ibrahimi, Faculty of Law, Algeria, 2023
Second: Legislations
i. Jordanian Civil Procedures Law No. (24) of 1988 and its amendments
ii. Jordanian Electronic Transactions Law No. (15) of 2015
iii. Defense Law No. (13) of 1992.
iv. Jordanian Evidence Law No. (30) of 1952 and its amendments.
v. Regulation of the Use of Electronic Means No. (95) of 2018.
vi. Defense Order No. (21) of 2020 issued under the Defense Law.
vii. Iraqi Civil Procedures Law No. (83) of 1969.
viii. Iraqi Evidence Law No. (107) of 1979.
ix. Iraqi Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. (78) of 2012.
x. Iraqi Federal Supreme Court Law No. (30) of 2005.
xi. Egyptian Civil and Commercial Procedures Law No. (13) of 1968.
xii. Egyptian Electronic Signature Law No. (15) of 2004
xiii. Egyptian Economic Courts Law No. (120) of 2008 and its amendment Law No. 146 of 2019.
xiv. French Civil Code.
xv. French Civil Procedure Code.
Third: Judicial Rulings
i. Jordanian Court of Cassation, Rights, Decision No. 376 on 4/3/2021, Qistas ublications.
ii. Jordanian Court of Cassation, Rights, Decision No. 379 on 7/9/1991, Qistas Publications
iii. Jordanian Court of Cassation, Five-Member Panel, Decision No. 5487 on 16/12/2020, Qistas Publications.
iv. Jordanian Court of Cassation, Rights, Decision No. 3276 on 7/9/2020, Markaz Qarark Publications, Journal of the Bar Association
v. Jordanian Court of Cassation, Rights, Decision No. 4592 on 11/10/2022, Markaz Qistas Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
