Digital Genocide Criminal Responsibility for Exploiting Cyberspace as a Means to Commit Genocidal Crimes under Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/d410na52Keywords:
Digital Genocide, Cyberspace, Criminal Liability, Yazidi GenocideAbstract
The research highlights the phenomenon of digital genocide as one of the emerging criminal patterns in which cyberspace is utilized as a tool for committing acts of genocide through the ideological indoctrination of hatred against other identities and the digital mobilization aimed at discriminating against them and excluding them from the sphere of social participation. The significance of this study emerges from the increasing danger posed by extremist groups in their use of digital technologies, including what Iraq witnessed through the practices of the ISIS terrorist organization against the Yazidi community and other components, where such practices combined field operations with digital means in carrying out genocidal acts.
The study adopts a criminal-law approach to clarify the concept of digital genocide, define its parameters, and compare it with traditional forms of genocide. It further examines the motives and factors that make cyberspace a fertile environment for the commission of such crimes—whether due to the speed of dissemination, the difficulty of monitoring, or the direct influence exerted on public opinion. The research also addresses the resulting consequences, such as the fragmentation of national and religious identity, ultimately facilitating displacement and physical liquidation.
On the analytical level, the research explores the criminal classification (legal characterization) of these acts within the framework of Iraqi law, identifying gaps in national legal provisions—whether in the Penal Code or in legislation related to terrorism and cybercrimes. It also outlines the direction of criminal policy in combating this pattern of criminality in accordance with the methodology of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The study concludes that confronting digital genocide requires the development of the Iraqi legislative system, strengthening judicial and security cooperation with the international community, and establishing regulatory and legal mechanisms capable of prosecuting perpetrators and preventing the exploitation of cyberspace as a platform for genocide. It further emphasizes the necessity of imposing liability on platform owners as partners in the digital conduct carried out through their platforms—even when they do not consent to such conduct—since allowing the continuous commission of acts related to digital genocide places them within the scope of criminal responsibility.
Downloads
References
- The Holy Qur’an.
First: Arabic Sources
A. Books:
I. Ahmed, I. S. (2011). A Perspective on Certain Mechanisms of the International Criminal Court. Cairo: National Center for Legal Publications.
II. Al-Hadithi, F. A. R. S. (2018). Explanation of the Penal Code: General Part. Beirut: Al-Sanhouri Publishing.
III. Husni, M. N. (2012). Explanation of the Penal Code: General Part (7th ed.). Cairo: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia.
IV. Al-Haydari, J. I. (2017). Al-Wafi in the General Part of the Penal Code. Beirut: Al-Sanhouri Publishing.
V. Al-Khalaf, A. H., & Al-Shawi, S. A. Q. (2010). General Principles of Criminal Law. Cairo: Al-Atak for Book Industry.
VI. Roscrance, R. (2001). Expansion Without Conquest: The Virtual State in External Outreach (A. Barsoumi, Trans.). Cairo: Al-Ahram Translation and Publishing.
VII. Al-Shaabi, F. (2014). The Legal Regulation of Telecommunications Service Contracts (1st ed.). Lebanon: Zain Legal Publications.
VIII. Al-Tusi, M. b. al-Hasan b. Ali. (1994). Al-Amali (1st ed., Islamic Studies Department – Al-Ba’tha Foundation, Ed.). Qom: Dar Al-Thaqafa.
IX. Fadlallah, M. H. (1993). From the Inspiration of the Qur’an: Exegesis (Vol. 8, 3rd ed.). Beirut: Al-Malak Publishing House.
X. Al-Qabbanji, H. (2002). Explanation of the Treatise of Rights by Imam Zayn al-Abidin (Vol. 2, 1st ed.). Beirut: Al-A’lami Publications.
XI. Kazem, N. (n.d.). Why Do We Hate? Or Unrestrained Hatreds Once Again. Beirut: Dar Su’al.
XII. Al-Labban, S. D. (2015). The Media Strategy for Confronting ISIS: A Study of the Organization’s Structure. Cairo: Arab Center for Research and Studies.
XIII. Ibn Abi al-Hadid al-Madaini. (1967). Commentary on Nahj al-Balagha (Vol. 17, 2nd ed.). Qom: Library of Grand Ayatollah al-Mar’ashi al-Najafi.
XIV. Naji, A. B. (2004). Management of Savagery: The Most Dangerous Phase the Ummah Will Experience. Islamic Studies and Research Center.
XV. Huntington, S. (1999). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order (M. Ubaid & M. M. Khalaf, Trans., 1st ed.). Libya: Jamahiriya House for Publishing.
B. Research Articles
I. Al-Jader, T. Z. (2006). The Terrorist Crime and Means of Prevention. Political and International Journal – Al-Mustansiriyah University, 1(4).
II. Al-Hassani, S. (2022). The Creed of ISIS. Hammurabi Journal for Studies, 44(1).
III. Abbas, Z. M., & Farhan, B. N. A. (2025). Digital Extremism. Babel Center Journal for Human Studies, 15(6).
IV. Al-Ghalabi, R. A. (2023). Intellectual Extremism. Legal Studies Journal – Bayt Al-Hikma, 58.
V. Qasim, A. F. (2007). Legal System for Internet Service Providers. Al-Manar Journal – Algeria, 19(9).
VI. Lafta, S. T., & Jabr, Z. R. (2024). Shared Responsibility for ISIS Digital Crimes. Anbar University Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, 14(2).
VII. Mahdi, I. M. (2021). Electronic Jihad. Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Political Science, 22(2).
C. Theses and Dissertations
I. Al-Jubouri, K. M. A. (2010). Criminal Policy in the Anti-Terrorism Law. Master’s thesis, University of Babylon.
II. Haji, Z. F. E. (2024). Criminal Protection for Victims of Enslavement. Master’s thesis, University of Baghdad.
D. Judicial Decisions
I. Federal Court of Cassation. (2018). Decision No. 8988/Criminal Board/2017.
II. Federal Court of Cassation. (2023). Decision No. 17891/Criminal Board/2023.
III. Federal Court of Cassation. (2024). Decision No. 20512/Criminal Board/2024.
E. Legislation
I. Penal Code No. 111 of 1969.
II. Anti-Terrorism Law No. 13 of 2005.
III. Yazidi Survivors Law No. 8 of 2021.
F. Internet Sources
I. BBC News Arabic. (2025, October 31). "Iraqi Teen Pushes 30 Roblox Players to End Their Lives."
https://www.bbc.com/arabic/articles/czdrrpz6mvmo
Second: Foreign Sources
I. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
II. Conway, M. (2017). The role of social media in the rise of extremism. Journal of Terrorism Research, 8(1), 12–20.
III. Holt, T. J. (2018). Digital media and the radicalization of youth: The role of social networks. Youth & Society.
IV. Johnson, L., et al. (2022). The impact of violent content on youth. Cyberpsychology, 15(3), 85–95.
V. Karadima, S. (2016). New trends in terrorism: The use of social media, cyber-terrorism, the role of open source intelligence… (Master’s thesis, University of Piraeus). University of Piraeus Repository.
VI. Kadhim, R. A. (2025). The criminal confrontation of the cyber murder crimes. International Journal of Criminal, Common and Statutory Law, 5(1), 36–42.
VII. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
VIII. Ternon, Y. (1995). Réflexions sur le génocide. In G. Chaliand (Ed.), Les minorités à l’âge de l’État-nation.
IX. Weimann, G. (2016). Terrorism in Cyberspace: The Next Generation. Columbia University Press.
Downloads
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
