Genocide against the Yazidis A Legal Study on Victims’ Suffering and the Accountability of ISIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/z7q4tc63Keywords:
Genocide, International Criminal Law, ISIS, Yazidis, International Accountability, International Criminal Court, Transitional JusticeAbstract
This paper examines the crime of genocide from both a legal and humanitarian perspective, with a specific focus on the atrocities committed by ISIS against the Yazidi community in Iraq since 2014. These crimes—including mass killings, sexual enslavement, and forced displacement—constitute a clear instance of genocide under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The study analyzes the international legal framework defining and criminalizing genocide and assesses its applicability to the Yazidi case, emphasizing the centrality of victims in the pursuit of international criminal justice. It also evaluates the accountability mechanisms available, including the International Criminal Court, ad hoc tribunals, and the exercise of universal jurisdiction by national courts (such as those in Germany).
The research highlights the major challenges to accountability, including Iraq’s non-accession to the Rome Statute, deficiencies in domestic legislation, and practical barriers to evidence collection and witness protection. Finally, the paper offers recommendations for enhancing accountability through the adoption of domestic legislation aligned with international law, greater international judicial cooperation, and the promotion of transitional justice mechanisms to ensure reparations for victims and the prevention of future atrocities.
Downloads
References
I. Lemkin, R. (1944). Axis rule in occupied Europe. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
II. International Military Tribunal. (1947). Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal (Vol. 1). Nuremberg.
III. Barrett, J. (2010). The UN Convention on Genocide: A commentary. Oxford University Press.
IV. United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf
V. International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/rs-eng.pdf
VI. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. (1998). Prosecutor v. Akayesu (ICTR-96-4-T). https://ucr.ictj.org/en/document/prosecutor-v-jean-paul-akayesu
VII. International Court of Justice. (2007). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/91/091-20070226-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
VIII. United Nations Investigative Team to Promote Accountability for Crimes Committed by Da’esh/ISIL. (2024). Report on crimes against the Yazidis. https://www.unitad.un.org/
IX. Duarte-Herrera, M., & Ifsits, C. (2017). ISIS and the Yazidi genocide: Evidence collection. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 15(3), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqx020
X. International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf
XI. Cetorelli, V., Ashraph, S., & Shabila, N. (2017). A demographic documentation of the ISIS genocide against the Yazidi religious minority. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184427
XII. Saul, B. (2021). Genocide in international law: The crimes of the Islamic State. Cambridge University Press.
XIII. Kress, C., & Prost, K. (2024). Universal jurisdiction in the fight against impunity. European Journal of International Law, 35(1), 145–178.
XIV. Schabas, W. A. (2020). Genocide in Cambodia and the Yazidi case: Comparative analysis. Oxford International Law Series.
XV. Ambos, K. (2021). Treatise on international criminal law: Volume II – The crimes and sentencing. Oxford University Press.
XVI. Dörmann, K., Doswald-Beck, L., & Kolb, R. (2019). Elements of war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press.
XVII. Stahn, C. (2019). The law and practice of the International Criminal Court. Oxford University Press.
XVIII. International Criminal Court. (2016). Prosecutor v. Bemba (ICC-01/05-01/08). https://www.icc-cpi.int/cases/bemba
XIX. Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie’s principles of public international law (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.
XX. Akande, D. (2021). The ICC and non-party states: The case of Iraq. European Journal of International Law, 32(2), 489–503.
XXI. Johansen, R. (2022). Geopolitical barriers to international justice. Global Governance, 28(4), 521–540.
XXII. Hurd, I. (2020). The UN Security Council and the veto power in cases of genocide. International Organization, 74(3), 523–548.
XXIII. Al-Rubaie, A. (2023). Iraqi sovereignty and international criminal justice. Middle East Law Review, 14(2), 201–225.
XXIV. Burke-White, W. W. (2021). Complementarity in practice: The ICC and national courts. International Criminal Law Review, 21(5), 789–815.
XXV. Cassese, A. (2008). International criminal law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
XXVI. Bassiouni, M. C. (2021). Universal jurisdiction for international crimes. Brill.
XXVII. Reydams, L. (2023). The rise and fall of universal jurisdiction. Oxford University Press.
XXVIII. Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main. (2021). Case against Taha Al-Jumaili. https://www.olg-frankfurt.justiz.hessen.de/
XXIX. Bundesgerichtshof. (2024). Appeal decision in Yazidi genocide case. https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/
XXX. District Court of The Hague. (2024). Case against Hasna A. https://www.rechtspraak.nl/
XXXI. Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris. (2024). Case against Sonia Alexandre. https://www.justice.fr/
XXXII. United Nations Investigative Team for Accountability of Da’esh/ISIL Crimes. (2023). Digital evidence collection report. https://www.unitad.un.org/
XXXIII. Al-Dayel, R., & Puttick, M. (2021). Digital evidence in ISIS prosecutions. International Criminal Law Review, 21(3), 423–451.
XXXIV. Ryngaert, C., & Sobrie, S. (2021). The effectiveness of universal jurisdiction. Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 367–389.
XXXV. Heller, K. J. (2020). The limits of universal jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 31(4), 1157–1184.
XXXVI. Kontorovich, E. (2021). Universal jurisdiction and the Yazidi genocide. Northwestern University Law Review, 115(3), 789–824.
XXXVII. Meloni, C. (2021). Command responsibility in international criminal law. Brill.
XXXVIII. Danner, A. M., & Martinez, J. S. (2021). Guilty associations: Joint criminal enterprise. Yale Journal of International Law, 46(1), 1–48.
XXXIX. Dukhan, N. (2020). ISIS and the Yazidis: A study in destruction. Routledge.
XL. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (2001). Prosecutor v. Krstić. https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/tjug/en/krs-tj010802e.pdf
XLI. Al-Tamimi, A. (2021). The ISIS governance system. Middle East Review, 12(1), 45–67.
XLII. Hansen, M. (2023). Command structure in ISIS. Terrorism Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 112–130.
XLIII. Allison, S. (2021). Crimes of ISIS: Documentation and evidence. Oxford University Press.
XLIV. Ingram, H. J. (2021). ISIS propaganda: The Yazidi narrative. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(8), 689–708.
XLV. Yazda Organization. (2022). Systematic destruction of Yazidi heritage. https://yazda.org/
XLVI. Casey, C., & Rose, M. (2022). Digital forensics in ISIS investigations. Journal of Digital Forensics, 15(2), 89–104.
XLVII. Browning, C. R. (2017). The final solution and the Holocaust. In D. Bloxham & R. Gellately (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of genocide studies (pp. 423–445). Oxford University Press
XLVIII. Akande, D. (2021). The ICC and non-party states: The case of Iraq. European Journal of International Law, 32(2), 489–503.
XLIX. Akhavan, P. (2017). The Yazidi genocide: A legal analysis. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 15(5), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqx054
L. Al-Dayel, R., & Puttick, M. (2021). Digital evidence in ISIS prosecutions. International Criminal Law Review, 21(3), 423–451.
LI. Allison, S. (2021). Crimes of ISIS: Documentation and evidence. Oxford University Press.
LII. Ambos, K. (2021). Treatise on international criminal law: Volume II: The crimes and sentencing. Oxford University Press.
LIII. Barrett, J. Q. (2010). Raphael Lemkin and “Genocide” at Nuremberg. In The Genocide Convention. St. John’s University.
LIV. Bassiouni, M. C. (2021). Universal jurisdiction for international crimes. Brill.
LV. Browning, C. R. (2017). The final solution and the Holocaust. In D. Bloxham & R. Gellately (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of genocide studies (pp. 423–445). Oxford University Press.
LVI. Burke-White, W. W. (2021). Complementarity in practice: The ICC and national courts. International Criminal Law Review, 21(5), 789–815.
LVII. Casey, C., & Rose, M. (2022). Digital forensics in ISIS investigations. Journal of Digital Forensics, 15(2), 89–104.
LVIII. Cassese, A. (2008). International criminal law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
LIX. Cetorelli, V., Ashraph, S., & Nazanin, S. (2017). A demographic documentation of the ISIS genocide against the Yazidi minority. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184427
LX. Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie’s principles of public international law (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.
LXI. Danner, A. M., & Martinez, J. S. (2021). Guilty associations: Joint criminal enterprise. Yale Journal of International Law, 46(1), 1–48.
LXII. Dörmann, K., Doswald-Beck, L., & Kolb, R. (2019). Elements of war crimes under the Rome Statute of the ICC. Cambridge University Press.
LXIII. District Court of The Hague. (2024). Case against Hasna A. (Case No. 09/784269-23). https://www.rechtspraak.nl/
LXIV. Duarte-Herrera, R., & Ifsits, C. (2017). Genocide against Yazidis. University of Vienna Law Review, 1, 81–108.
LXV. Hansen, M. (2023). Command structure in ISIS. Terrorism Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 112–130.
LXVI. Heller, K. J. (2020). The limits of universal jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 31(4), 1157–1184.
LXVII. Hurd, I. (2020). The UN Security Council and the veto power in cases of genocide. International Organization, 74(3), 523–548.
LXVIII. Ingram, H. J. (2021). ISIS propaganda: The Yazidi narrative. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(8), 689–708.
LXIX. International Court of Justice. (2007). Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (Genocide Case, para. 190). https://www.icj-cij.org/
LXX. International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Art. 6). https://www.icc-cpi.int/
LXXI. International Criminal Court. (2016). Prosecutor v. Bemba (ICC-01/05-01/08). https://www.icc-cpi.int/
LXXII. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. (1998). Prosecutor v. Akayesu (ICTR-96-4-T). https://www.unictr.ictj.org/
LXXIII. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (2001). Prosecutor v. Krstić (IT-98-33-T). https://www.icty.org/
LXXIV. International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts (Art. 40). https://legal.un.org/
LXXV. Johansen, R. (2022). Geopolitical barriers to international justice. Global Governance, 28(4), 521–540.
LXXVI. Kontorovich, E. (2021). Universal jurisdiction and the Yazidi genocide. Northwestern University Law Review, 115(3), 789–824.
LXXVII. Kress, C., & Prost, K. (2024). Universal jurisdiction in the fight against impunity. European Journal of International Law, 35(1), 145–178.
LXXVIII. Lemkin, R. (1944). Axis rule in occupied Europe. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
LXXIX. Meloni, C. (2021). Command responsibility in international criminal law. Brill.
LXXX. Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main. (2021). Case against Taha Al-Jumaili (Case No. 5-3 StE 4/19-4-3/19). https://www.olg-frankfurt.justiz.hessen.de /
LXXXI. Reydams, L. (2023). The rise and fall of universal jurisdiction. Oxford University Press.
LXXXII. Ryngaert, C., & Sobrie, S. (2021). The effectiveness of universal jurisdiction. Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 367–389.
LXXXIII. Saul, B. (2021). Genocide in international law: The crimes of the Islamic State. Cambridge University Press.
LXXXIV. Savelsberg, J. J. (2021). Genocide documentation and justice. University of Chicago Press.
LXXXV. Schabas, W. A. (2020). Genocide in Cambodia and the Yazidi case. Oxford International Law Series.
LXXXVI. Stahn, C. (2019). The law and practice of the International Criminal Court. Oxford University Press.
LXXXVII. Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris. (2024). Case against Sonia Alexandre (Case No. 23/05842). https://www.justice.fr/
LXXXVIII. United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Art. 2). https://www.un.org/
LXXXIX. UNITAD. (2023). Digital evidence collection report. https://www.unitad.un.org/
XC. UNITAD. (2024). Report on crimes against the Yazidis. https://www.unitad.un.org /
XCI. Williams, S., & Palmer, A. (2021). Hybrid courts: The model for post-conflict justice. Cambridge University Press.
XCII. Wood, R. M. (2021). The ideological roots of ISIS. Princeton University Press.
XCIII. Yazda Organization. (2022). Systematic destruction of Yazidi heritage . https://yazda.org /
Downloads
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
