Violation of the rights of sound record producers (piracy)
A Comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v36i0.427Keywords:
Sound record producers, Piracy, sound recordings, Technical measuresAbstract
Piracy is one of the most important problems faced by sound record producers, because it is a problem that evolves with the development of time and technology, and although piracy is not a new problem, it has received great attention in recent years, because of the means by which (the Internet) and its size result from it, even In many of the ruler, describing it as (the crime of the electronic age) and she participated in the great harm it causes to all the groups involved in it producing the sound recording, because there are three categories that contribute to the production of the sound recording, which is (the author of the recorded work, the artist who performs the work and the producer who performs an operation Performance recording and its transfer to and distribution of records), these three categories mentioned above are affected by the piracy process in general terms, the author and artist often have a certain percentage of the profits achieved by the sound recording, when piracy of this recording in any way, this will lead to the loss of a large part of the profits, And consequently the effect on the financial compensation mentioned by the three groups mentioned above is received.
Downloads
References
أولاً الكتب القانونية:
I. د.أسامة أبو الحسن مجاهد، حماية المصنفات على شبكة الانترنت، دون طبعة، دار النهضة العربية، مصر، 2010.
ثانياً:المقالات:
I. عبدالله شقرون، الحماية الأدبية والفنية في عهد القرصنة السمعية-البصرية، مجلة الاذاعات العربية(مجلة فصلية يصدرها إتحاد إذاعات الدول العربية)/ركن التشريعات والقوانين، العدد2، 2005.
ثالثاً:الندوات والحلقات التدريبية:
I. د. حسن الجميعي، حق المؤلف والحقوق المجاورة في سياق الإنترنت، ندوة الويبو الوطنية عن الملكية الفكرية لأعضاء هيئة التدريس وطلاب الحقوق في الجامعة الأردنية، المنظمة العالمية للملكية الفكرية(الويبو) بالتعاون مع الجامعة الأردنية، الأردن/عمان، من 6 إلى 8 أبريل/نيسان 2004.
II. سيفيرين دوسولييه، دراسة نطاق بشأن حق المؤلف والحقوق المجاورة والملك العام، المنظمة العالمية للملكية الفكرية (الويبو)، اللجنة المعنية بالتنمية والملكية الفكرية، الدورة السابعة، جنيف، من 2إلى 6 مايو 2001.
رابعاً: القوانين والاتفاقيات الدولية:
I. قانون حماية حق التأليف الأمريكي لسنة 1972 المعدل.
II. قانون الملكية الفكرية الفرنسي رقم 92/597 لسنة 1992.
III. قانون الألفية الرقمية لحماية حق المؤلف الأمريكي لسنة 1998
IV. التشريع النموذجي لحماية حق المؤلف والحقوق المجاورة في الوطن العربي الصادر في سنة 1998.
V. قانون حماية حقوق الملكية الفكرية المصري رقم (82) لسنة 2002.
VI. قانون حماية حقوق المؤلف والحقوق المجاورة له في إقليم كردستان-العراق رقم(17) لسنة 2012.
VII. اتفاقية جنيف لحماية منتجي الفونوغرامات من استنساخ فونوغراماتهم دون تصريح، المؤرخة في 29 اكتوبر/ تشرين الاول 1971.
VIII. معاهدة الويبو بشأن الاداء والتسجيل الصوتي (WPPT) المؤرخة في جنيف في 20 ديسمبر/ كانون الاول عام 1996.
خامساً: المصادر الاجنبية:
I. Adrian Adermon and Che-yuan Liang, Piracy, Music, and Movies: a Natural Experiment, Working Paper Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, Uppsala University, Sweden, October 2010.
II. Alice Kao, RIAA v. VERIZON: Applying the Subpoena Provision of the DMCA, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 19:405, 2004.
III. Daniel Reynolds, The RIAA Litigation War on File Sharing and Alternatives More Compatible with Public Morality, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Volume 9, Issue 2, 2008.
IV. David Edward Agnew, Reform in the International Protection of Sound Recordings: Upsetting the Delicate Balance between Authors, Performers and Producers or Pragmatism in the Age of Digital Piracy?, Digital Commons, Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School, Vol. 13, 1-1-1993.
V. Henriquez, Ryan S., Facing the Music on the Internet: Identifying Divergent Strategies for Different Segments of the Music Industry in Approaching Digital Distribution, Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol 7:1, 1999.
VI. Ian Condry, Cultures of Music Piracy an Ethnographic Comparison of the US and Japan, International Journa of Cultural Studies, Volume 7, 2004
VII. James Dooley, Noise Annoys: Pirate Radio and the Distribution of Music in the Digital Age, A thesis submitted to The Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts, Institute of Political Economy/Carleton University, March 2008.
VIII. Jelle Janssens, Stijn Van Daele and Tom Vander Beken, The Music Industry on (the) Line? Surviving Music Piracy in a Digital Era, European
IX. Journal of Crime, Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP), Ghent University, Belgium, 2009.
X. John A. Fedock, The RIAA v. The People: The Recording Industry Misguided Attempt to Use the Legal System to Save Their Business Model, Pepperdine Law Review, Volume 32, Issue 4, 2005.
XI. Jolene Lau Marshall, Online Music Piracy: Can American Solutions Be Exported to the People’s Republic of China to Protect American Music?, Washington International Law Journal, Volume 14, Number 1, 1-1-2005.
XII. Joost Poort and João Pedro Quintais, Global Online Piracy Study, University of Amsterdam/Information Law Institute, The Netherlands, July 2018
XIII. Jordana Boag, The Battle of Piracy and Privacy: How the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) Is Using the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) As Its Weapon Against Internet Users’ Privacy Rights, California Western School of Law, Volume 41, Number . 1
XIV. Jyh-Shen Chiou, Chien-yi Huang and Hsin-hui Lee, The Antecedents of Music Piracy Attitudes and Intentions, Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, 2005.
XV. Lan Michael Dobie, The Impact of New Technologies and the Internet on the Music Industry( 1997-2001), Institute for Social Research, School of Music Media and Performance University of Salford, Salford, UK, September, 2001.
XVI. Martin Fredriksson, Copyright Culture and Pirate Politics, journal Cultural Studies/ Linköping University, Volume 28, Issue 5-6, Sweden, 2014.
XVII. Oliver Quiring, Benedlkt Von Waltre and Richard Atterer, Can Filesharers be Triggered by Economic Incentives? Results of an Experiment, Journals Sage/ New Media & Society, Vol 10, 2008.
XVIII. Paul Benjamin Lowry, Jun Zhang and Tailai Wu, Nature or Nurture? A Meta-analysis of the Factors that Maximize the Prediction of Digital Piracy by Using Social Cognitive Theory as a Framework, 10-Nov-2016.
XIX. Sandrine Hallemans, Etude relative à la lutte contre les atteintes au droit d’auteur sur internet, Centre de Recherche Information, Droit et Société (CRIDS) Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix – Namur, 24 septembre 2012.
XX. Serhan Aykac, A New Era Begins in Digital Music, Master of Arts (Music), I.T.U. Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, May, 2007.
XXI. Stan J. Liebowitz, File-Sharing: Creative Destruction or just Plain Destruction?, School of Management/University of Texas at Dallas, March 2005.
XXII. Sue Ann Mota, Napster: Facilitation of Sharing, or Contributory and Vicarious Copyright Infringement?, Journal of Law, Science & Technology is published/ the University of Minnesota, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2001.
XXIII. Tin Cheuk Leung, Should the Music Industry Sue Its Own Customers Impacts of Music Piracy and Policy Suggestions, 2 September 2009.
XXIV. Victor Dzomo-Silinou, Les législations de lutte contre le téléchargement illégal : entre riposte graduée et filtrage de l’Internet, Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle, Vol 26, No 1.
XXV. Wan Man Jason Fung and Avnita Lakhani, Combating peer-to-peer file sharing of copyrighted material via anti-piracy laws: Issues, trends, and solutions, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 29, Issue 4, August 2013.
XXVI. Whitney D. Gunter, George E. Higgins and Roberta E. Gealt, Pirating Youth: Examining the Correlates of Digital Music Piracy among Adolescents, International Journal of Cyber Criminology, Vol4, Issue1&2, January - July 2010 / July - December 2010.
XXVII. Yogesh Bajpai and Parul Bajpai, Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on the Music and Film Piracy: A General Study, International Journal of Digital Library Services, Vol1, Issue1, July- Sept, 2011.
سادساً :المصادر الالكترونية:
I. www.hadopi.fr
II. www.eff.org/ar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
