Compensation for Psychological Damage Caused by Negligence
A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/ydbesa14Keywords:
Pure, Neglect, Nervous Shock, Primary Victim, Secondary VictimAbstract
Psychological damage is one of the damages that can be compensated under the fault of negligence in the framework of English law, where the latter intends to include an enumeration of civil errors on the basis of which liability can be determined, and aims under each of these errors to protect a specific interest (for example, defamation protects Among the damage to reputation and inconvenience are the rights contained on the land), and the same is true for the rest of the other errors.
Compensation for psychological damage resulting from negligence has raised problems in cases where the psychological injury is "pure", that is, those that are not accompanied by a physical injury, which required subjecting them to special requirements by the English judiciary to succeed in obtaining compensation for the aforementioned damage.
Downloads
References
i. أمجد، محمد منصور ، التعويض عن الضرر الادبي الناشئ عن المسؤولية التقصيرية وانتقاله، المجلة العربية للدراسات الأمنية والتدريب، المجلد 20 ، العدد 39.
ii. حسام ، حسين علي ، 2018 ، التعويض عن الضرر المرتد (دراسة مقارنة) ، رسالة ماجستير ، جامعة البيت ، كلية الحقوق.
iii. محمد حنون جعفر وزبير مصطفى حسين، 2019 ، الضرر التبعي والأساس القانوني لدعوى التعويض عنه (دراسة تحليلية في القانون المدني العراقي) ، بحث منشور في المجلة العلمية لجامعة جيهان - السليمانية ، المجلد 3 ، العدد 2.
iv. محمد ، صديق محمد عبد الله ، 2017 ، الضرر المرتد في نطاق المسؤولية المدنية عن حوادث الطائرات ، مجلة العلوم القانونية ، المجلد 32 ، العدد 2.
v. محمود ، هدوان قاطوع، 2021 ، أحكام الضرر المرتد المعنوي، رسالة ماجستير جامعة جرش ، كلية الحقوق،2021.
vi. مقدم، السعيد ، 1985 م ، التعويض عن الضرر المعنوي في المسؤولية المدنية "دراسة مقارنة" ، دار الحداثة ، الطبعة الأولى.
vii. مناس منى و اوسيف اسمهان ، 2015 ، الضرر المرتد في المسؤولية المدنية ، رسالة ماجستير جامعة عبد الرحمن - بجاية ، كلية الحقوق والعلوم السياسية.
viii. هبة، نعيم أبو حطب ، 2018 ، التعويض عن الضرر المعنوي (دراسة تحليلية مقارنة) ، رسالة ماجستير جامعة الأزهر- غزة ، كلية الحقوق.
Second: Foreign sources
i. Assafa Endeshaw, Foreseeability of Nervous Shock to a Primary Victim' who Suffers no Physical Injury, Mountbatten Journal of Legal Studies.
ii. CRAIG PURSHOUSE, Liability for Lost Autonomy in Negligence: Undermining the Coherence of Tort Law?, 2015 ,Torts Law Journal.
iii. David W. Robertson, 1994, Review: Liability in Negligence for Nervous Shock, The Modern Law Review, volume 57,issue 4.
iv. Des Butler, 2002, An assessment of competing policy considerations in cases of psychiatric injury resulting from negligence, Torts Law Journal.
v. Elliot&Quinn series , 2009 ,tort law, pearson, seventh edition.
vi. Gemma Turton,2008, Defining Damage in the House of Lords,The Modern Law Review, volume 71,issue 6.
vii. GERALD SCHAEFER, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW ON PSYCHIATRIC INJURY IN THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM,The New Zealand Postgraduate Law e-Journal, Issue 4.
viii. Harvey Teff, 1998, Liability for Psychiatric Illness: Advancing Cautiously, The Modern Law Review, volume 61,issue 6.
ix. John cooke, 2017, law of tort, pearson, thirteenth edition.
x. Margaret Fordham, 2008, RISK AND ANXIETY—DEFINING DAMAGE IN THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE: Rothwell v. Chemical & Insulating Co. Ltd. & Anor, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies.
xi. Margaret Fordham, 2014, PSYCHIATRIC INJURY SECONDARY VICTIMS AND THE 'SUDDEN SHOck REQUIREMENT, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies.
xii. Peter Handford, RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NERVOUS SHOCK’ AND PSYCHIATRIC INJURY IN HEALTH LAW LITIGATION.
xiii. P.J. Rowe ,1977 ,The Demise of The Thin Skull Rule, Modern law review, volume 40 , issue 4.
xiv. PRUE VINES,1993, PROXIMITY AS PRINCIPLE OR CATEGORY : NERVOUS SHOCK IN AUSTRALIA AND ENGLAND,Unsw law journal: volume16,issue2.
xv. RAMANAN RAJENDRAN, 2004, TOLD NERVOUS SHOCK: HAS THE PENDULUM SWUNG IN FAVOUR OF RECOVERY BY TELEVISION VIEWERS?, DEAKIN LAW REVIEW, volume 9,issue 2.
xvi. Tan Keng Feng,2000, DISCUSSION PAPER ON LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENTLY INFLICTED PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS, National University of Singapore.
xvii. Vivenne harpwood, 2009, MODERN TORT LAW, routledge Cavendish, Seventh Edition.
xviii. Winfield &jolowicz, 1979, tort, sweet and Maxwell, eleventh edition.
xix. بحث منشور على الرابط الاتي https://api.researchrepository.uwa.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/479600/3602_PID3602
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
