The Role of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Providing Legal Consultations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/reb92292Keywords:
smart legal consultation, smart legal counselor, Artificial intelligence, technological dependency, virtual legal servicesAbstract
Artificial intelligence is a technology that has a superior ability to learn, develop, and the ability to make appropriate decisions. It has the ability to deal with situations and develop appropriate solutions to them, and the ability to sweep the field of providing legal services such as consultations that were traditionally provided through a lawyer or a legal consulting office. Today, because of these technologies, legal advice is provided by default by a smart legal consultant.
We have adopted a comparative analytical approach by defining the concept of this technology, indicating the position of legislation, as well as reviewing judicial developments in order to assess the final position of the smart legal consulting system.
One of the results of the study of smart legal advice is the difficulty of providing it without human intervention because the first is a mental product, so the traditional legal adviser is indispensable, especially in thorny legal matters that need explanation and explanation. As for liability within the scope of artificial intelligence technologies, everyone agrees on the existence of liability and compensation, but the dispute revolves around the basis of that liability and the extent to which those technologies have the legal personality to claim responsibility
Downloads
References
I. Abdu Al-Saheb, A. (2007). the obligation of Safety Ensuring of People in Executing Contracts.
II. Abdu-Al-Redha, H. A. (2011). Contractual Imbalance Caused by Arbitrary Conditions (A Comparative Study). Journal of Legal Sciences, 26 (2)
III. Alahmed, Mohammed, and Tahsin Smael. (2022) 2023. “Commitment to What Is Necessary As an Idea to Embody the Element of Morality in Law”. Journal of Legal Sciences 37 (2): 1-54. https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v37i2.543
IV. Al-Dahiyat, E. (2018). From Science Fiction to Reality: How will the law adapt to Self-Driving Vehicles? Journal of Arts and Humanities , 7 (9)
V. Ali m. abd alsaheb ,Evolution of the notion of a defect positive guarantee , Volume 36/ 1st Issue/ May/ 2021
VI. Almajid, W. m. (2010). Can Electronic Agents Be Granted Legal Personality under Islamic Law? A Conceptual Rethink Is Imperative. Arab Law Quarterly , 24 (4)
VII. Amir, A. A. (2023). Legal Protection of Computer Programs,. Journal of Legal Sciences, , 38 (1)
VIII. Bader, M. R. (2022). Civil Liability Arising from the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in UAE Legislation. Middle East University Faculty of Law.
IX. Bashat, J. H. (2014). The Inner Will in the Contract, (A Study in Iraqi Civil Law). (1. ed, Ed.) Baghdad: Al-Sanhouri Library.
X. Castets،, C. (2020, fevrier 6). Comment construire une intelligence artificielle responsable et inclusive?
XI. Cavity, S. (2015). Robotics Law,. the Institute’s Journal, Dubai Judicial Institute, (2)
XII. Chopra, S., & white, L. (2010). Artificial Agents and the Contracting Problem : Solution Via an Agency Analysis,. Journal of Law Technology & Policy, , 2019 (2)
XIII. Conn, A. (2015, November 14). Benefits and risks of artificial intelligence.
XIV. Coustet, T. (2019, avril 15). La réalité derrière le fantasme de la justice robot,. Dalloz actualité .
XV. Daniel W. Linna Jr, Evaluating Legal Services: The Need for a Quality Movement and Standard Measures of Quality and Value, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd,2020
XVI. Daniel W. Linna Jr, Evaluating Legal Services: The Need for a Quality Movement and Standard Measures of Quality and Value, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd,2020
XVII. Daniel, B. F. (2017). Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law: An Analysis and Proof of Concept Experiment. Rich. J. L. & Tech. , 23 (2)
XVIII. Dimitropoulos, G. (2020). the law of Block chain,. Washington law review
XIX. Fabien Moutarde, L. I. (2019). Fabien Moutarde, Les Intelligence Artificielle pour l’Industrie: quel type pourquelle innovation?, Entretiens de Toulouse:la formation par le débat
XX. G.Courtois. (2016). Robots intelligents et responsabilité; quels régimes, quelles perspectives. (6), 287.
XXI. Harris, R. J. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Product Liability: A New Framework. Stanford Technology Law Review , 22 (2), 249-295.
XXII. Hassan, H. F. (2023). Compensation for Psychological Harm Caused by Negligence,. Journal of Legal Sciences , 38 (1)
XXIII. Hutchinson, T. (2006). Researching and Writing in Law. ((. ed.), Ed.) Pyrmont NSW: Lawbook Co.
XXIV. Joel S. Newman, Legal Counsel Toward Illegal Ends, University of Richmond Law Review, Volume 28 | Issue 2, Article 3.
XXV. John, O. M. (2014). The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services. Fordham Law Review
XXVI. Kranzberg, M. “Technology and Hiisttorry” Krranzberrg laws. “Technology and Culture , 27 (3)
XXVII. Lassegue, J. (2019). L’intelligence artificielle technologie de la vision numerique du monde. (2), 206.
XXVIII. Latif, M. M. (2021). for Artificial Intelligence between Private Law and Public Law,. Conference on the Legal and Economic Aspects of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Journal of Legal and Economic Research, Faculty of Law - Mansoura University , special issueof the twentieth annual conference
XXIX. Mahmoud Sayed, and Mahmoud Ahmed. 2023. “The formation of the legal monarchy and the scope of its application.” Journal of Legal Sciences 38 (2):1-48. https://jols.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jols/article/view/715.
XXX. Mark, M. (2017). Legal Technology: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Practice. Rev. Current L. & L.Reform, , 22
XXXI. Mary, A. N. (2017). Artificial Intelligence:. Legal Research and Law Librarians AALL Spectrum , 21 (5)
XXXII. Maxi, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Decision- Making: The WideOpen Study on the Example of International Arbitration. Queen Mary University of London, School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 318, 1-33 (No 318)
XXXIII. Md. Aminur Islam, Jannatul Ferdaus, Md. Abbas Ali khan and Md. Tarek Habib, ONLINE LEGAL SERVICE: THE PRESENT AND FUTURE, International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 10, No 5, October 2018
XXXIV. Merabet, S. (2020, Avril 9). Vers un droit de l'intelligence artificielle-– Pascale Deumier– RTD civ. 224.
XXXV. Othman, A. M. Z. (2023). Smart Contract: Theoretical Basis and Application Dialectic. Journal of Legal Sciences, 38(1).
XXXVI. RICHARD SUSSKIND, TOMORROW'S LAWYERS An Introduction to Your Future, Second Edition, OXFORD,UNITED KINGDOM , 2017
XXXVII. S. Russell et P. Norvig. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach, Pearson,. (3. éd., Ed.) Education Limited,. England
XXXVIII. Thomas, J. B. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Court Legitimacy Problems of AI Assistance in the Judiciary. Rets kraft-Copenhagen Journal of Legal Studies , 2 (1)
XXXIX. Tian Ming Huang, Design and Implementation of App System for Legal Consulting Based on JAVA Technology, Procedia Computer Science 166 (2020) 100
XL. Vigliotti, M. G. (2021). What Do We Mean by Smart Contracts? Open Challenges in Smart Contracts, Journal Frontiers in Blockchain
XLI. Weldon , M. N., & Epstein, R. (2019). Beyond Bitcoin : Leveraging Blockchain to Benefit Business And Society, Transactions :. The Tennessee Journal of Business Law , 20 (3)
XLII. WILLY BACH, study of legal Counsel at local level, ministry of justice, June 2009
XLIII. Zein, S. (2023). The civil liability for the artificial intelligent. BAU journal ,journal of legal studies , 2022 (Art 14), 5.
XLIV. zuboun, A., & Hussain, A. m. (2015). Specific performance of the Contract for the International Sale of Goods. Journal of Legal Sciences , 30 So (Special Issue 2015), 45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
