Provisions for annulment in a reconciliation contract
A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/0c1q4s19Keywords:
annulment, reconciliation contractAbstract
First of all, The annulment raises scientific and practical problems that reflect its peculiarity, as it relates to how the judge faces the dispute in a case in which reconciliation between the litigants took place, and what can be attributed to the judge’s judgment in this regard, whether that estimate is related to the factual elements in the case or the objective elements and their approach With the circumstances surrounding the dispute, and considering the possibility of applying the provisions of annulment established in the general rules, which is not easy in all cases due to the special nature of annulment in the conciliation contract, it is necessary to clarify the role that the judge plays, and his use of his legal tools that establish his authority and authority in Settlement of the dispute, in exchange for the right of the litigants to direct the litigation in the direction they see fit to settle the dispute by agreement between them through a reconciliation contract or resort to annulment in the event that one of them breaches the obligations imposed on him under the reconciliation contract.
Downloads
References
First: The Holy Qur’an.
Second: References in Arabic
- Legal references:
i. Abdel Wahab, Ashraf Ahmed and Ahmed, Ibrahim Sayed: 2018, Loan Contract, Permanent Income, and Reconciliation in Light of the Opinions of Jurists, Legislation, and Judicial Rulings, 1st edition, Dar Al Adala for Publishing and Distribution, Cairo.
ii. Al-Khouli, Aktham: 1957, Civil Contracts - Conciliation, Gift, and Agency, 1st edition,.
iii. Al-Nidani, Al-Ansari Hassan: 2001, Judicial Reconciliation - An original and analytical study of the role of the court in reconciliation and reconciliation between opponents, New University Publishing House, Alexandria.
iv. Sultan, Anwar, The Summary of the General Theory of Commitment, “Al-Masdar”, New University Press, Alexandria, 2005.
v. Taher, Iman Muhammad: 2003, Commitment to Ensure Safety in the Sales Contract, Master’s Thesis, College of Law, University of Mosul.
vi. Omar, Ben Said: 2001, Judicial Jurisprudence According to the Provisions of Civil Law, First Edition (Algeria, National Office of Educational Works, Algeria.
vii. Al-Rashid, Bin Shuwaikh: 2012, Lessons in the General Theory of Commitment, Ed., Dar Al-Khaldounia, Algeria.
viii. Wafaa, Bin Nasser, Bin Shaalal Nasima: 2015, The Principle of Relativity of Contract, a memorandum for obtaining a master’s degree, Faculty of Law - University of Hebron Dr. Rahman, Bejaia, Algeria.
ix. Al-Saadi, Jalil Hassan: 1996, The circumstances surrounding the damage and their impact on the estimation of compensation in tort, Journal of Legal Sciences, First Issue, Volume Eleven.
x. Heikal, Gamal Ahmed: 2016, Agreement on reconciliation and reconciliation between disputants, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Jami’i, Alexandria.
xi. Al-Dhanoun, Hassan Ali, 1989, Al-Mabsoot, Al-Dharar, Times Printing Company, Baghdad.
xii. Omar, Hamdi Pasha: 2004, Civil Judiciary, Algeria, Houma House for Printing and Publishing.
xiii. Abu Al-Saud, Ramadan: 1977, Lessons in the Principles of Commitment, 1st edition.
xiv. Abu Saeed, Winter: 1999, Texts of the Civil Law in Commentary on its Explanatory Memorandum, Preparatory Works, and Opinions of Explanatory Jurists, Part Three, Named Contracts, Alexandria, University Press House.
xv. Hegazy, Abdel-Hay, The General Theory of Commitment, Sources of Commitment, Part 2, Al-Nahda Press, Cairo, D.S.
xvi. Al-Sanhouri, Abdel-Razzaq Ahmed: 2000, Al-Waseet fi Sharh Al-Nadeem Civil Law, Contracts that Fall on Property, 3rd edition, Al-Halabi Legal Publications, Beirut, Lebanon.
xvii. Al-Sanhouri, Abdel-Razzaq Ahmed, 2000, Al-Wasit fi Sharh Al-Kanun Al-Adha New Civil Code, third edition, Al-Halabi Publications, Rights. Yes, Beirut.
xviii. Abdel-Hakim, Abdel-Majeed and Al-Bakri, Abdel-Baqi and Al-Bashir, Muhammad Taha: 2015, Civil Law and Provisions of Commitment, Part 2, Dar Al-Sanhouri, Beirut.
xix. Al-Douri, Adnan Taha, 1995, Provisions of Commitment and Proof in the Libyan Civil Law, D. I., Open University Publications, Alexandria, Egypt.
xx. Bakr, Ismat Abdel Majeed, 2018, Al-Wajeez fi Contracts Named – Kafala, Zain Legal Publications, Beirut.
xxi. Nawal, Ghebrioui and Nasima, Hamadou: 2018, Conciliation Contract in Algerian Civil Law, a memorandum submitted to obtain a Master’s degree in Law, specializing in comprehensive private law, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Abderrahmane Mira University, Bejaia.
xxii. Abdullah, Fathi Abdel Rahim: 2001, Explanation of the General Theory of Commitment, Book One: Sources of Commitment, 3rd edition, Manshaet Al Maaref, Alexandria, Egypt.
xxiii. Ali, Filali: 2013, Obligations, The General Theory of Contract, 03rd edition, Movem Publishing, Algeria.
xxiv. Al-Badawi, Muhammad Ali: 2010 AD, The General Theory of Commitment, Part 2, Ahkam Al-Tibiya, 2nd ed., D.N.
xxv. Muhammad, Muhammad Ali: less than a year of publication, Judicial Conciliation, Zein Legal Publications, Lebanon.
xxvi. Pasha, Muhammad Kamel Morsi: 2005, Explanation of the Civil Law (Named Contracts), Egypt.
xxvii. Mohseni, Mohamed, Boughrara, Samir, Bouterfa, Abdel Razzaq, Abbad, Ghawar, Mouloud, Mohamed Baba, Ezzedine, Berenice, General Provisions of Conciliation, the first chapter of the graduation thesis for student judges, batch 13, available at the following electronic link: SciencesJuridiques.ahlamontada -net
xxviii. Al-Zanati, Mahmoud: without a year of publication, Roman Law Systems, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo. xxix. Al-Tahwi, Mahmoud Al-Sayed: 2007, Conciliation and Arbitration in Civil and Commercial Matters, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Jami’i, Alexandria.
xxx. Maryam, Mammeri, Tawoos, Bouchlah: 2013, Liability resulting from non-performance of the contract, a memorandum submitted to obtain a master’s degree in law, specializing in comprehensive private law, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Abderrahmane Mira University, Bejaia.
xxxi. Hanna, Mounir Riyad: 2014, Civil Liability of Doctors and Surgeons in Light of French and Egyptian Jurisprudence and Jurisprudence, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Jami’i, Alexandria.
xxxii. Yahya, Yasin Muhammad: 1978, Reconciliation Agreement between Islamic Sharia and Civil Law, a comparative study - judicial and legislative jurisprudence, Cairo, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi.
xxxiii. Ali, Younis Salah al-Din: 2018, Al-Wajeez fi Explanation of the English Civil Wrongs Law, Zein Legal Publications, Beirut.
- Linguistic references
i. Al-Misbah Al-Munir fi Ghareeb Al-Sharh Al-Kabir Author: Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Ali Al-Fayoumi, then Al-Hamwi, Abu Al-Abbas (deceased: about 770 AH) Publisher: Al-Maktabah Al-Ilmiyya - Beirut 2010, 436/2.
ii. Al-Taqeef on the Important Definitions: By Muhammad Abd al-Raouf ibn Taj al-Arifin ibn Ali ibn Zain al-Abidin al-Haddadi and then al-Manawi al-Qahiri (died: 1031 AH), Dar al-Fikr al-Ma’asir, Dar al-Fikr - Beirut, Damascus, first edition, 1410, edited by: Dr. Muhammad Radwan Al-Daya.
iii. Bin Manzour, Abu al-Fadl Jamal al-Din Muhammad Bin Makram, 1954, Lisan al-Arab, Volume Three, Beirut Medical House Publishing and publishing, Beirut.
iv. The Arabic Language Academy, 1989, The Brief Dictionary, Publisher, The Contemporary Arabic Language Academy, the Contemporary Arabic Language Academy, 1989. A kitten.
- Laws and legislation
i. Iraqi Civil Law No. 40 of 1951.
ii. French Civil Code, issued in 1804 and amended by the French Contract Code of 2016.
iii. Egyptian Civil Code issued in 1948.
Third: Foreign references
i. Guettier Ch. , 2000, Droit des contrats administratifs, P.U.F, Paris, 2011.
ii. CARBONNIER Jean, Droit Civil, Tom 04: les Obligations, 22éme ed, puf, Paris.
iii. MAZEAUD Henri et Léon, 2000, MAZEAUD Jean, CHABAS François, Leçons de Droit Civil: Tome 02: premier volume, les obligations, 9éme ed, Monchrestien, Delta, Beyrouth, Liban, p.850.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
