Criminal Protection of Human Genome “Human Gene Editing as a Model”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/fcs6yg41Keywords:
Human Genome, Human Gene Editing, Legal Protection, Human Genome CrimesAbstract
Lawful protection of the human gene conceded a moral concern regarding the future of existence human. After the discovery of the human genetic map, scientific experiments and research related to the human gene increased, negative applications of genetic engineering in particular that violate essential human rights, the right to human dignity to be specific. These practices represent actual challenges to the existence and diversity of current and future generations. Therefore, the presence of legal rules at the domestic and global levels is an absolute necessity to prohibit these threats and determine civil and criminal accountability for those who infringe any laws related to this issue.
Downloads
References
Books
I. Mahran, Mahmoud Abdel Rahim. Sharia and Legal Provisions for Intervention in the Factors of Heredity and Reproduction. 1st ed. Egypt: Modern Renaissance House, 2001.
II. Rizk, Hani Khalil. A Brief History of the Universe: From the Big Bang to Human Cloning. 1st ed. Damascus: Dar Al Fikr, 2003.
III. Smith, Jenna. The Era of Postgenomics. Вестник Росздравнадзора. 1st ed. Vol. 1469. Egypt: National Center for Translation, 2010.
Dissertation and Theses.
i. Giudicelli, André. “Génétique Humaine et Droit : À La Redécouverte de l’homme.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. : Université de Poitiers. UFR, 1993.
ii. Hawa, Tariq Abdullah Muhammad Abu. “Legal Repercussions of Artificial Reproduction, ‘a Comparative Study,.’” Mansoura University, 2009.
iii. Mutair, Mahdi Kazem. “International Protection of the Human Genome.” Baghdad Universit, 2023.
iv. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Medicine; National Academy of Sciences; Committee on Human Gene Editing: Scientific, Medical, and Ethical Considerations. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Human Genome Editing. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). 1st ed. Washington (DC), 2017. https://doi.org/10.5840/ncbq201717110.
Research Paper
i. Araki, Motoko, and Tetsuya Ishii. “International Regulatory Landscape and Integration of Corrective Genome Editing into in Vitro Fertilization.” Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 12, no. 1 (2014): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-108.
ii. Beers, Britta C van. “Rewriting the Human Genome , Rewriting Human Rights Law ? Human Rights , Human Dignity , and Human Germline Modification in the CRISPR Era.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7(1), no. lsaa006 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa006.
iii. BERNARDI, Marie-Josée. “Diversité Génétique Humaine : Éléments d’une Politique.” Thémis à l’adresse Suivante 35 (2001): 327–406. https://ssl.editionsthemis.com/uploaded/revue/article/rjtvol35num1_2/bernardi.pdf.
iv. Christian Hervé, Michèle S. Jean, Patrick A. Molinari, Marie-Angèle Grimaud, Emmanuelle Laforêt, and Avec. “Généticisation et Responsabilités.” In Cet Ouvrage Est Issu Des Actes Du Septième Séminaire d’experts Franco-Québécois de l’Institut International de Recherche En Éthique Biomédicale (IIREB). France: à l’Université René-Descartes (Paris V), 2008. http://ethique.sorbonne-paris-cite.fr/sites/default/files/dalloz_2008_0.pdf.
v. Cyranoski, David. “China Set to Introduce Gene-Editing Regulation Following CRISPR-Baby Furore.” Nature- National lLbrary of Medicine, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01580-1
vi. Dahm, Ralf. “Friedrich Miescher and the Discovery of DNA.” Developmental Biology 278, no. 2 (2005): 274–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.028.
vii. Mutair, Mahdi, and Husam Abdul Ameer. 2023. “Standard Protection for the Human Genome”. Journal of Legal Sciences 37 (August): 667-97. https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v38i2.690.
viii. Khalaf, Hussam Abdel Amir, and And Muhammad Ismail Al-Arkawi, (2021). “Safeguarding the Intangible Heritage During Armed Conflict”. Journal of Legal Sciences 36 (December): 337_362. https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v36i0.420.
ix. Khalaf, Hossam Abdel Amir. “International Protection of the Human Genome.” Al-Haqiqah Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences 4, no. 20 (2021): 1–26. file:///C:/Users/SFM/Downloads/الحماية-الدولية-للجينوم-البشري (1).pdf.
x. Majeed, Sahar Fouad, Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Field of Modern Forensic Evidence “Brain Fingerprinting as a Model,” Vol.16, No.3, 2024. ( 513-530). https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.513.530
xi. Muhammad, Ahmed Saad. “Constitutional Principles Relating to the Human Genome.” Journal of Legal and Economic Studies 8, no. 0 (2022): 1–45. https://doi.org/10.21608/jdl.2022.258901 .
xii. Musa, Adnan Abbas. “The Moral Responsibility of the International Community Regarding Human Cloning.” Journal of Political Science 43 (2011): 75–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30907/jj.v0i43.233.
xiii. Pasha, Hassan Shamsi. “Genetics and Genetic Engineering.” Islamic Culture Magazine 13, no. 1 (2017): 199–270. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/156137 .
xiv. Rudge, D W. “The Man Who Invented the Chromosome.” Heredity 97, no. 2 (2006): 136–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800856.
xv. Sergeev, Danil. “The First Case of Human Genome Editing: Criminal Law Perspective.” BRICS Law Journal 6, no. 4 (2019): 114–33. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2019-6-4-114-133.
xvi. Song, Lingqiao, and Yann Joly. “After He Jianku : China ’ s Biotechnology Regulation Reforms.” Medical Law International 21(2), no. January (2021): 174–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533221993504.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
