Interpretative Judgment in The Framework of The International Judiciary - The International Court of Justice As an example

Authors

  • Zainab Abdel Sattar Jabbar College of Law - University of Baghdad
  • Assistant Professor Doctor Mustafa Salem Abdel College of Law - University of Baghdad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35246/ynt3sd28

Keywords:

international justice Court, Interpretative judgement

Abstract

That the International Court of Justice is a court of first and last instance, it is a fundamental principle that its rulings are final and cannot be appealed as stipulated in Article 60 of the Statute. Nevertheless, the provision of this Article provides that the States parties to the case may request an interpretation of the decision,  When certain conditions are available, the International Court of Justice has traditionally issued interpretative rulings when the ruling is marred by any ambiguity or ambiguity.  Final determination of judgment and res judicata, in the case of interpretation, if a decision or part of a decision is ambiguous, it may prove impossible for the States Parties to comply with it, and then a request for interpretation may be exactly the best way to ensure compliance and achieve res judicata as indicated  The Court recently, the process of interpretation is based on the priority of the res judicata principle that must be preserved  Specifically, it is the subject of the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hindi, Ahmed. 1992, The Principle of Two-Level Litigation, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo.

ii. Nabil, Noyes. 2017, The validity of international judicial rulings, a master’s thesis submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Law, University of Algiers, Algeria.

iii. Treaty of Neuilly: https://archive.org/stream/peacetreaties00alli#page/46/mode/2up

iv. The Hague Convention of 1907.

v. Washington Convention 1907.

vi. Statutes of the International Court of the Sea.

vii. Augusto, Antonio. 2017, Statutes of the International Court of Justice, United Nations Audiovisual Library. viii. Statute of the International Court of Justice.

ix. Omar, Hussein Hanafi, 2007 AD, “The international judicial ruling, its validity and guarantees of its implementation,” an analytical study of arbitration rulings, the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court, second edition: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo.

x. Qashi, Al-Khair, 2000, The Problem of Implementing International Judicial Rulings between Text and Reality, University Foundation for Publishing and Distribution, Beirut.

xi. Hindi, Ahmed, 1995, Law of Civil and Commercial Procedure (Litigation, Judgment, and Appeal), Part Two, New University Publishing House, Alexandria.

xii. (Alwan, Bassem Ghannawi. 2021, Interpreting treaties through the subsequent behavior of states parties, Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, University of Diyala, Volume Ten, Issue Two.

i. Kazimierz Grzybowski. 1941, Interpretation of Decisions of International Tribunals, American Journal of International Law, vol.35,No.3.

ii. Helmersen ST. 2021;The Methodology of Formal Interpretations of Judicial Decisions by the International Court of Justice. Nordic Journal of International Law. 90(3).

iii. Juan juśe Quintana. 2015,Litigation at the International Court of Justice Practice and Procedure, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,vol.10,

iv. Request for Interpretation-Cameroon v. Nigeria, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry, ICJ Rep 1999,

v. N.L.Hill,“The Interpretation of the Decisions of International Courts”, Georgetown Law journal,vol. 22 (1933–1934),.

vi. Request for Interpretation-Cameroon v. Nigeria, Judgment of 25 March 1999, ICJ Rep. 1999.

vii. Request for Interpretation-Cameroon v. Nigeria, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry, ICJ Rep. 1999.

viii. Genocide Convention (Bosnia), Merits, Judgment of 26 Feb. 2007, ICJ Rep. 2007.

ix. South West Africa-Voting Procedure, Advisory Opinion of 7 June 1955, ICJ Rep. 1955.

x. Shabtai Rosenne.Rosenne’s Law and Practice at the international court of justices (1920-2015), Leiden,Boston:Brill Nijhoff,2016, vol. 3.

xi. Hugh Thirlway.The law and procedure of the international court of Justice:fifty years of jurisprudence, part 13,British Yearbook of International Law,vol.74,2003.

xii. Dumberry Patrick. Le recours en interprétation des arrêts de la Cour Internationale de Justice et des sentences arbitrales. In: Revue Québécoise de droit international, volume 13-2, 2000.

xiii. Application for Revision and Interpretation-Tunisia/Libya Continental Shelf, Judgment of 10 Dec. 1985, ICJ Rep. 1985.

xiv. Request for Interpretation-Cameroon v. Nigeria, Dissenting Opinion of Vice-President Weeramantry, ICJ Rep. 1999.

xv. judge Anzilotti’s dissent in the Request for Interpretation-Factory at Chorzów case (PCIJ A 13, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anzilotti.

xvi. Request for Interpretation-Temple of Preah Vihear, Judgment of 11 Nov. 2013.

xvii. Request for Interpretation-Treaty of Neuilly, Judgment No. 4, 26 March 1925, PCIJ A 4.

xviii. Request for Interpretation-Factory at Chorzów, Judgment No. 11, 16 Dec. 1927, PCIJ A 13, p. 21.

xix. Request for Interpretation/Asylum, Judgment of 27 Nov. 1950, ICJ Rep. 1950, p. 402. Reaffirmed

xx. in the Request for Interpretation-Avena ( Judgment of 19 Jan. 2009, ICJ Reports 2009, para. 44) and Request for Interpretation-Temple of Preah Vihear (Provisional Measures, Order of 18 July 2011, para. 44) cases.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

Jabbar, Zainab, and Mustafa Abed. 2023. “Interpretative Judgment in The Framework of The International Judiciary - The International Court of Justice As an Example”. Journal of Legal Sciences 38 (2): 827-52. https://doi.org/10.35246/ynt3sd28.

Similar Articles

211-220 of 225

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.