Principle of lex specialis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v36i4.507Keywords:
Lex Specialis, concept of principle, characteristics, difficuletiesAbstract
The principle running a distinguished position among the general principles of law in international law ,and because it is one of the well- established principle in the national legal systems in the world ,and this justifies the voluntary approach of the principle as an expression of the will of stste, so the principle was under study by the international law commission in the subject of fragmentation as one of the legal methods linking the rules systems of traditional interntional law to maintain its coherence. Thst the works of the principle by international judiciary between the various international legal standards are in accordance with the concept of jurisprudence with certain conditions and in view of its distinctive characteristics however ,the application of the principle faces difficulties whose identification is an aspect of the precise definition of the principle.
Downloads
References
الكتب العربية
i. مصطفى ابراهيم الزلمي,المنطق القانوني في التصورات ,بغداد: المكتبة القانونية ,تريخ النشر بلا, ص60.
ii. ميشيل ترويير, فلسفة القانون , ترجمة جورج سعد , دار الانوار للنشر والطباعة , بيروت, 2004.
iii. أحمد فتحي سرور, النقض في المواد الجنائية ,القاهرة: الناشر دار النهضة العربية ,1988 ,ص146.
iv. نبيل أسماعيل عمر,سلطة القاضي التقديرية في المواد المدنية والتجارية , القاهرة : منشأة المعارف بالاسكندرية , 1984,
v. ماركو ساسولي و انطوان بوفييه, كيف يوفر القانون الحماية في الحرب ؟ اللجنة الدولية للصليب الأحمر , 2011.
الرسائل والاطاريح
i. خنساء محمد جاسم , تجزؤ القانون الدولي العام في ظل تنوع وتوسع قواعده , أطروحة دكتورا مقدمة إلى جامعة النهرين –كلية الحقوق, 2019.
الوثائق
i. الدورة السادسة والسبعون التقرير الثاني عن الاتفاقات اللاحقة والممارسة اللاحقة فيما يتعلق بتفسير المعاهدات(A/CN.4/671) , 2014,
ii. تقرير الفريق الدراسي للجنة القانون الدولي الدورة الثامنة والخمسون, A/ Cn.4/ L.682)) ,2006, ص31.
iii. تقرير لجنة القانون الدولي الثامنة والخمسون , A/ CN.4/ SER.A/ 2000/ Add. (Part2) ,ص271.
iv. تقرير لجنة القانون الدولي الدورة الخامسة والخمسون, (A/58/10) , 2003.
v. تقرير لجنة القانون الدولي, اعمال الدورة الثالثة والخمسين (A/CN.4/SER.A/2001/ (Add.1.
المصادرالانكليزية
i. Liliana E.Popa , Patterns Of Treaty Interpretation As Anti Fragmentation Tools , Springer International Publishing, 2018.
ii. Teresa M.Thorp , Climate justice :A Voice of future – palgrave macmillan 2014.
iii. Anja Lindroos , Addressing Norm Conflict in a Fragmented Legal System : The Doctrine Lex Specialis- Nordic Journal International Law 2005.
iv. Pouw, E.H, IHRL And Loac In Context Of Countering Agency With Particular Focus On Targeting And Operational Deletion – University Amsterdam, 2013.
v. Silvia Borelli, The (Mis) Use Of General Principle Of Law lex Specialis And The Relation Ship Between International Human Rights Law And The Laws Of Armcl Conflict ,2012 , P25.
vi. Silvia Zerzetto, The lex specialis principle and its uses in legal aegumentation Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 2013. [email protected].
vii. Dorota Marianna Banaszewska ,Lex Specialis, The Law of Armed conflict and use of force : Max plank Encyclopida of public of international law , Oxford University Press ,2015,p695
viii. Joost Pauwelyn , Conflict Of Norms In Public International Law-Cambridge,2003 , P406, Pouw, E.H, Op, Cit, P130.
ix. Michael Waibel , The Origins of Interpretive Canons in Domestic Legal Systems , University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Legal Studies ,2018. http://www.law.cam.ac.uk/ssrn/
x. Anne Peters, The Refinement international law: from fragmentation to regime interaction and politicazation, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 15 ,2017 P682.
xi. Panagiotis Merkouris, Article 31 (3) ( C) Of The VCTL And Principle Of Systemic Integration- University Of London , 2010 .
xii. Martti Koskenniemi. Fragmentation Of International Law , Study Group Of Fragmentation, 2010, https://legal.un.org
xiii. Bruno Simma, Dirk Pulkowiki, Self-Contained Regime In International Law,The European Journal of International Law Vol.17, 2006.
xiv. Roberta Arnold and Noelle Quenivet , International Humanitarian Law and Human right Law – martinuse Nijhoff publishing , 2008.
xv. Musa Njabul Shongwe,The Fragmentation Of International Law Throught Regionalism, Unveristy Of Johannesburg, 2015.
xvi. Yvonne kanimi –schnidt,Lo sungsansatze fur normenkonflikte beterffend die grue Genetechnik in Europa –GRIN Verlay ,2014.
xvii. Frank Latty,La Mise En Oeuvr de la lex specialis dans le droit international contemporaian –Societe Francaise poir le Driot International ,Paris ,2011.
xviii. Gerd Oberleitner , Human Rights in Armed Conflict , Cambridge University Press ,2015.
xix. Hermann Mosler , Ecyclopiday Public International Law, Elsever Sciemce Publishers ,1984.
xx. Dorota Marianna Banaszewska , Lex Specialis,The Law Of Armed conflict and uses of Force ,The max planck Eencyclopedia of public international law – oxfored university press,2017.
xxi. Jorg Kammerhofer, unearthing structural uncertainty through neo- kelsenian consistency: conflict of norms in International law ,2018. http://esil-sedi.eu
xxii. Roberto Ago , Positivism – Ecyclopiday Public International Law.
xxiii. Anastasios Gourgourinis, Lex Specialis In WTO And Investment Protection Law – Published by the Society of International Economic Law, 2010. http://www.ssrn.com/link/SIEL-2010
xxiv. Rossana Deplano,fragmentation and constitutionalization of international law , Brunel University ,2012.
xxv. Iain Scobbie ,Exepetion :Self-defence as an Exepetion to the prohibition on the use of force , Expetional defence in international law ,oxfored university perss ,2020.
xxvi. Christina Voigt , Sustainable Development As a Principle of International Law: Resolving conflict between Climate Measuers and WTO law , Martinus Nijhoff publishers,2009.
xxvii. Ulf Linderfalk. On The Interpretation Of Treaties, Lund Uriversity, Sewdan, Springs, 2007.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
