Collusion in International Law

Authors

  • Zainab Abdulsattar Jabbar College of Oil and Gas Engineering – University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35246/7x267r47

Keywords:

International Complicity, Aid and Assistance, Joint International Responsibility, Knowledge and Intent

Abstract

This research addresses a complex issue in international law: the responsibility arising from "complicity," defined as a state providing aid and assistance to another state or entity to commit acts that violate international law. This encompasses not only direct wrongful acts but also the covert or secondary role a state may play by providing aid or assistance to another state or non-state actors, enabling them to commit internationally wrongful acts. The study outlines the conditions necessary for establishing international responsibility and examines judicial applications that demonstrate how international courts interpret Article 16 and other provisions related to the prohibition of aiding and abetting internationally wrongful acts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Al Arabiya. (2016, February 23). Italy agrees to let anti-ISIS drones depart from Sicily. https://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middleeast/2016/02/23/Italy-agrees-to-let-anti-ISIS-drones-depart-from-Sicily.html

II. Aust, A. (2010). Handbook of international law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

III. Bernhardt, G. (1996). Complicity in the law of international responsibility. Revue Belge de Droit International.

IV. Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide). (2007). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/

V. Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of public international law (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

VI. Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania) (Merits). (1949). International Court of Justice.

VII. Crawford, J. (2002). The ILC’s articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts: A retrospect. American Journal of International Law, 96(4).

VIII. Crawford, J. (2013). State responsibility: The general part. Cambridge University Press.

IX. Commentary to the First Geneva Convention. (2016). Cambridge University Press.

X. Georg Nolte, G., & Aust, H. P. (2009). Equivocal helpers—Complicit states, mixed messages and international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589308000821

XI. Henckaerts, J.-M. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law: Volume 1: Rules. Cambridge University Press.

XII. International Law Commission. (1978). Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1978 (Vol. I, p. 240).

XIII. International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts.

XIV. International Law Commission. (n.d.). Commentary to Article 41. https://legal.un.org/legislativeseries/pdfs/chapters/book25/english/book25_part2_ch3_art41.pdf

XV. Lanovoy, V. (2014). Complicity in an internationally wrongful act. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139940009.006

XVI. MENA Rights Group. (2023). Call to stop complicity in international crimes through a comprehensive arms embargo on Israel. https://menarights.org/ar/articles/aldwt-lwqf-altwatw-fy-aljraym-aldwlyt-n-tryq-frd-hzr-shaml-ly-twryd-alaslht-lasrayyl-mn

XVII. Moynihan, H. (2016). Aiding and assisting: Challenges in armed conflict and counterterrorism. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2016-11-11-aiding-assisting-challenges-armed-conflict-moynihan.pdf

XVIII. Nicaragua v. Germany (Alleged Violations of the Genocide Convention). (2024). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org

XIX. Nicaragua v. United States of America (Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua). (1986). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org

XX. Sassòli, M. (2002). State responsibility for violations of international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 84(846).

XXI. Schmitt, M. (Ed.). (2017). Tallinn manual 2.0 on the international law applicable to cyber operations (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

XXII. United Nations. (1986). General Assembly resolution 41/38: Condemnation of aggression against the Libyan people.

XXIII. United Nations. (2009). Security Council Resolution 1906 (S/RES/1906).

XXIV. United Nations. (2013). Arms Trade Treaty.

XXV. United Nations General Assembly. (1982). Report of the Third Committee (A/37/745).

XXVI. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2021). Ensuring respect for international human rights law and international humanitarian law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in Israel (A/HRC/RES/S-30/1).

XXVII. Usama Hamza Mahmoud. (2025). Arms exports between compliance with international humanitarian law and complicity in war crimes. Helwan Law Journal, 52(52).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Jabbar, Zainab. 2026. “Collusion in International Law”. Journal of Legal Sciences 41 (1): 637-57. https://doi.org/10.35246/7x267r47.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 279

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.