ماهية برامج الكمبيوتر في ضوء احكام القانونيين العراقي والانكليزي
دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v29i2.269Keywords:
برامج الكمبيوتر, القانونيين العراقي والانكليزيAbstract
Computer programs are works of importance of trade, scientific and practical, which is one of the key imports of industrialized countries such as the United States. Historically, computer programs have been found in commercial use since the sixties of the last century where the value is increasing day after day. This shows the urgent need to use them in our personal lives, let alone use in our business. However, it was during our study in the UK, I did not find what refers to determining what computer programs virtually, either through judicial decisions or legally, through legislation, both in common law countries that pursue curriculu Anglo-American system such as the law of England, and the U.S. or countries that pursue the curricu-lum Latin any civil such as the law and the Iraqi French.it was raised several questions in the research whether computer pro grams are thing and if so, are they tangibles or intangibles and what are the circumestances of this. In light of this research, it will focus on highlighting the theoretical and practical (judicial and legislative) to understand the nature of these programs. Researcher raised some questions to analysis of what the computer programs, and therefore, the methodology of this paper relies on the analysis and comparison of the provisions of civil law in Iraq and between the provisions of the common laws in England and the USA…
Downloads
References
1- المحامي محمد امين الرومي، حقوق المؤلف والحقوق المجاورة، دار الفكر الجامعي، الاسكندرية، ۲۰۰۹
2- د عبد الهادي فوزي العوضي، البرمجيات الحرة في القانون المصري (دراسة مقارنة)، دار النهضة العربية، القاهرة، ۲۰۱۲
3- د حسن عبد الباسط جمیعي، عقود برامج الحاسوب الآلي، دراسة مقارنة، دار النهضة العربية، القاهرة، ۱۹۹۸
4- د. عبد الرشید مأمون، د محمد سامي عبد الصادق، حقوق المؤلف والحقوق المجاورة في ضوء قانون حماية حقوق الملكية الفكرية، الكتاب الاول حقوق المؤلف، دار النهضة العربية، ۲۰۰4
5- د نبیل ابراهيم سعد، الحقوق العينية الاصلية - احكامها ومصادرها، دار المعارف بالإسكندرية، ۲۰۰۲
6- علي هادي العبيدي، الوجيز في شرح القانون المدني - الحقوق العينية، دار الثقافة للنشر والتوزيع، عمان، ۲۰۱۳
7- محمد طه البشير ود غني حسون طه، الحقوق العينية، الجزء الاول طبعة حديثة ۲۰۱۲، العاتك لصناعة الكتاب، القاهرة.
8- محمد طه البشير ود غني حسون طه، الحقوق العينية، الجزء الثاني، طبيعة حديثة ۲۰۱۲، العاتك لصناعة الكتاب، القاهرة العرش
9- د. همام محمد محمود زهران، التامينات العينية والشخصية ، دار المعارف، الاسكندرية، ۲۰۰۲ .
10- د محمد حسین منصور، شروط الاحتفاظ بالملكية، دار الجامعة الجديدة للنشر، الاسكندرية، ۲۰۰۳.
11- د. عبد الرزاق السنهوري، الوسيط في شرح القانون المدني، الجزء الأول، دار النهضة العربية، القاهرة، ۱۹۹۰، فقرة ۲۲۷. ایضا محمد ابو السعود، الوسيط في القانون المدني، الدار الجامعة، القاهرة، ۱۹۹۰
12- د. عبد الرحمن الخواجة، الحماية القانونية للبرمجيات، دار الجامعة القاهرة، ۱۹۹۷
13- اسل الصدام، الحماية المدنية لبرامج الكمبيوتر، رسالة ماجستير، كلية القانون، جامعة بابل، ۲۰۰۰
ثانيا : المراجع الانكليزية والأمريكية
1- SIIA report, "Software and Information: Driving the Global Knowledge Economy، http://www. S11a. con08.pdf [Accessed June 4, 2009 blishing Limited
2- Alastair Hudson (ed), New Perspective on Property Obligations and Restitution (Cavendish Publishing Li 2004)
3- Charles M. Haar & Lance Liebman, Property and Law (3rd edn, Little, brown& Company (Canada) Limited 1977) 153 & seq
4- Ali Al-Eliwi, Legal Framework for Protecting Computer Programs in the Ambit of Intellectual Property: A Comparative Study between Iraqi Law (Civil Law) and English Law (Common Law), Newcastle Law School, the UK, 2013.
5- William R. Trumble and Angus Stevenson (ed), Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, on Historical Principles (5th edn, OUP 2002) Volume 2, N-Z, 2361
6- Louise Carey and others, Technology and IP Law (Mark Hyland ed, 1st edn, Tottel Publishing Ltd 2008)
7- David I Bainbridge Legal Protection of Computer Software (West Sussex Tottel Pub 2008) xvii.
8- Manender Grewal, Copyright Protection of Computer Soft ware'. (1996) E.I.P. R. , 18 (8), 454-458.
9- European Int Redding PA, Report on the Computer Software in the face of Comput <http://www
10- warwick. ac uk/fa redding Int Redding PA, Report on the protection afforded ware in the face of Computer Software Piracy, warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1996 .
11- Michael Gifkins, Intellectual Property Rights in Software. A Practical Guide for professional & Business managers (Swindon: British Cataloguing in publication Data 2000)
12- Elad Harison,' Software Application As Economic Goods', (2008) Economic of innovation and new technology
13- Daehwan Koo, 'Patent and Copyright Protection of Computer Programs', (2002) IPQ25 (6), 821-839
14- Ian Somerville, Software Engineering (8th Edition, Person Education Limited. Essex. 2007)
15- Keen Moon, 'The Nature of Computer Program: Tangible? Goods? Personal Property? Intellectual Property' (2009) EIPR, 8, 1-19
16- James Buchan and Sunny Handa, 'Copyright as it applies to the Protection of Computer Programs in Canada' (1995) IRIP&CL 3.
17- Tom Allen and Wan Kwong Weng, 'Computer Software and Singapore's Law of Copyright' (1994) EIPR, 16 (11), 500 505,
18- Jane Ball, The Boundaries of Property Rights in English Law, vol. 10.3 ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, (December 2006), http://www. ejcl. org/103/ article103-1.pdf
19- Charles M. Haar & Lance Liebman, Property and Law (3rd edn, Little, brown& Company (Canada) Limited 1977)153 & seq
20- Janet McLean, Property and the Constitution, (Hart Pub ing 1999)
21- Elizabeth A. Martin & Jonathan Law (ed), The Dictionary ofLaw (OUP 2006)
22- Aileen Mcharg (ed), Property and the Law in Energy and Natural Resources (OUP 2010) 23.
23- Alison Clarke & Paul Kohler, Property Law (1 stedn, CUP 2005)
24- W. T Murphy &Simon Roberts, Understanding Property Law (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2004)
25- Sir Robert Megarry and Sir William Wade, The Law of Real Property (Charles Harpum, Stuart Bridge and Martin Dixon (ed), 7th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2012
26- Tony Honore, Making Law Bind-Essay Legal and Philoso phy (OUP 1987)
27- Andrew P. Bell, Modern Law of personal Property in Eng land and Ireland (Butterworths & Co Ltd1989) 35
28- Hugh Beale, The Law of Personal Property Security (OUP2007)
29- Hudson N PA, Pledge' in N Pal A. Pledge' in N Palmer and E McKendrick (eds), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, 1998)
30- Daniel H. Cole, New Forms oF Private Property: Property Rights in Environmental Goods, (1999) <http://encyclo. findlaw. com/1910book, pdf> Accessed 14 December 2010
31- Sandra B. Zellmer & Jessica Harder, Unbundling Property in Water (2008) <http://works. bepress. com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=sandi_zellmer .Accessed
32- July 2008 29-Alastair Hudson, Equity and Trusts (6th edn, Routledg & Cavendish 2010)
33- M. A. Lemley, “Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property” (2004) 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 129, 129
34- Carole Deschamps, 'Patenting Computer-Related Inven tions in the US and in Europe: the need for domestic and international legal harmony', (2011) EIPR, 33 (2), 103-114 .
35- The New Oxford Dictionary of English http://www.oed. com/view/Entry/197490?redirectedFrom=Tangibility#eid accessed 27 July 2010
36- Pretto-Sakmann Arianna, Boundaries of Personal Property: Shares and Sub-shares (Hart Publishing 2005) 73
37- District of Columbia v Universal Computer Associates. 465 F.2d 615 (DC. 1972).
38- Look at the decision in both American Courts at Computr ol- ler of the Treasuryv Equitable Trust Co (1983) and chitten- den Trust Co v King (1983). These was referred by Moon,p.4.
39- Look at the Supreme Court of Kansas in in the case Protest of Strayer, Re. See Moon, p. 4
40- F. H. Lawson and Bernard Rudden, The Law of Property (OUP 2002) 3. Bell, p. 21.
41- Sarah Worthington, Personal Property Law (Portland Ore-gon 2000)
42- M. G. Bridge, Personal Property Law, 3rd edn (Oxford Uni- versity Press Clarendon Law, 2002)
43- Garrow and Fenton, Law of Personal Property in New Zea-land, 6th edr. (Lexis Nexis, 1998)
44- Alison Jones & Brenda Sufrain, EC Competition Law, Texts, Cases, and Materials (3rd edn,OUP, 2008).
45- Giorgio Monti, EC Competition Law (1st edn. CUP, 2007)
46- D. G. Goyder &others, Goyder's EC Competition Law (5th edn, OUP, 2009).
47- Thomas Hoehn & Alex Lewis, 'Interoperability remedies, FRAND licensing and innovation: a review of recent case law' (2013) E.C.L.R. 34 (2), 101-111
ثالثا: القضايا الاجنية
1- Cope v. Sharp [1912]IKB 496; Cresswell v. Siril [1948] I KB 2.
2- Sperry Rand Co v Industrial Supply Corp, 337 F.2d 363 (5thCir.
3- Wharton Management Group v Sigma Consultants Inc, 1990.
4- Measurex Systems v State Tax Assessor, 499 A. 2d. 1192 (Me. 1985)
5- Micro-Managers Inc v Gregory, 147 Wis. 2d 500 (Ct 1988.
6- Advent Systems Ltd v Unisys Corp, 925 F. 2d 670 (3rd Cir.1991)
7- Wake of Kremen v Cohen Houston Law Review 2,489,2005
8- the Full Court of the Federal Court in Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd v ASX Operations Pty Ltd (1991) A. T. P. R. 41-069.
9- Federal Commissioner of Taxation v United Aircraft [1944] 68 C. L. R. 525 at 535 (High Court of Australia).
رابعا: القوانين
1- القانون المدني العراقي
2- قانون حق المؤلف العراقي ۱۹۷۱ المعدل عام ۲۰۰4
3- قانون النشر والتأليف البريطاني لعام ۱۹۸۸.
4- و قانون حقوق النشر والتاليف الامريكي لعام 1976 المعدل عام ۲۰۰۷
5- قانون حق النشر والتأليف الكندي ۱۹۸۸
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
