The Consent in Contracting By Electronic Means With A Professional Party According to the New French Law of Contract of 2016-
An Analytical Comparative Study With The Iraqi Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/5rta1645Keywords:
Consent, Electronic means, Professional Party, Amendment, Offer, AcceptanceAbstract
This research is concerned with studying the consent in contracting by electronic means with any person in general، and with a professional in particular، in the light of the French civil code، amended by the ordinance No.2016-131 dated February 10، 2016 concerning reforms of the law of contract، general regime and proof of obligations. The study is aimed at the benefit of the Iraqi law from the special rules of the new French law of contract as exemplary rules، concerning the expression of the consent in contracting by electronic means، particularly with a professional. The problem of the study lies in how to fill the gaps in both the Iraqi civil law No.40 of 1951، and the law of electronic signature and electronic bargains No.78 of 2012 regarding the up-to-date requirements and modalities of the consent in contracting by electronic means، and its components of the offer and acceptance. To achieve this aim، the study adopts the comparative analytical methodology of legal research. The most significant findings that the study reached are the considerable shortage of the legal regulation and the rules concerning the consent in contracting by electronic means in the Iraqi civil law، as compared to the detailed regulation of this topic in the French law of contract. Finally the study suggested many recommendations to the Iraqi legislator to follow suit the new rules of the French law of contract particularly the article (1127).
Downloads
References
References
First: The Legal Books in Arabic
i. Abdul Majeed Al Hakim. The concise of the explanation of the general theory of obligations. Part one, sources of Obligations. a comparison with Islamic Jurisprudence. Baghdad. 1963.
ii. Abdul Majeed Al Hakim. The Medium Commentary (Al Wasit) on the theory of contract, with the comparison and balancing between the theories of the western jurisprudence and their equivalent theories in the Islamic Jurisprudence and the Iraqi civil law. Part one. Conclusion of the contract. Al-Ahliyyah company for printing and publishing. Baghdad. 1967.
iii. Abdul Razaq Al Sanhouri. The Medium Commentary on the elucidation of the New Civil Code (Al Wasit in the Explanation of New Civil Law). Part One. The theory of obligations in general. Sources of obligations. Contract-illegal act-Unjust enrichment-law. Al-Ma'arif Publishing house. Alexandria.2004.
iv. Abdul Razaq Al Sanhouri. The sources of the rights in the Islamic jurisprudence a comparative study with the western jurisprudence. The harmony of the two contractual wills in the council of contract-validity of consent. Part Two. Al-halabi Juridique Publishing house. Beirut. 1998.
v. Ahmed Salaman Shuhaib Al-Sa'adawi and Jawad Kadhum Jawad Sumaisem. The sources of Obligations, A comparative study with civil laws and Islamic jurisprudence. Second Edition. Zein juridique library. Beirut. 2017.
vi. Dara'a Hammad, The general theory of obligations, Part one, sources of Obligations, Al-sanhouri Publishing house, Beirut, 2016.
vii. Hasan Ali Al-Thannon and Mohammad saeed Al-Rahho.The nutshell in the general theory of the obligation. Part one, the sources of obligations, a comparative study with the Islamic and comparative Jurisprudence. First Edition. Dar Wael for printing and publishing. 2002.
viii. Ismat Abdul Majeed Baker. The role of the scientific technology in the development of the contract. Scientific Books publishing house Beirut. 2015.
ix. Ismat Abdul Majeed Baker. The theory of contract in the Arab civil laws. Scientific Books publishing house Beirut. 2015.
x. Khalid Mamduh Ibrahim. The conclusion of the electronic contract a comparative study. Al-Fikr Al-Jamai'i Publishing House Alexandria. 2011.
xi. Munther Al-Fadhel, The Medium Commentary on the explanation of the civil law, A comparative study between Islamic Jurisprudence and Arab and foreign laws, A study reinforced by opinions of both the jurisprudence and judiciary. Aras Publishing house, Erbil, 2006.
Second : The Legal Books in English
i. John Cartwright & Simon Whittaker. The Code Napoléon rewritten, French contract law after the 2016 reforms. Hart Publishing Oxford. 2017.
ii. John Cartwright, Stefan Vogenauer & Simon Whittaker. Reforming the French law of Obligations, Comparative Reflections on the Avant-Projet de Reforme du Droit des Obligations et de la Prescription (the Avant-projet catala) . Hart Publishing Oxford. 2009.
third: The Legal Books in French
i. Alain Bénabent. Droid Civil Les Obligations. Troisième edition. Montchrestien Paris. 1991.
ii. Annick Batteur. Droit Civil Des Obligations, Les Annales Du Droit. DALLOZ. . 2017.
iii. Boris starck, Henri Roland et Laurent Boyer. Obligations 2. Contrat. Quatrième edition. Litec, Libraire de la cour de cassation. Paris.1993.
iv. Corinne Renault-Brahinsky. Droit des Obligations. 16e édition. Gualino. 2020.
v. Francois Collart Dutilleul et Philippe Delebecque. Contrats Civils et Commerciaux . 6e edition. Dalloz. 2002.
vi. François Terré, Philippe Simler, Yves Lequette, François Chénedé. Droit Civil. Les Obligations. 12e édition. DALLOZ. 2019.
vii. Gérard Légier. Droit Civil Les Obligations. Treizième édition. Dalloz-Sirey.1992.
viii. Jean Louis Halperin. The French Civil Code. Translated by Tony Weir. University College London (UCL) Press. 2006.
ix. Philippe Malaurie et Laurent Aynès. Droit Civil. Les contrats spécieux. DEFRENOIS, Edition juridique associées. 2003.
x. Stephanie Porchy-Simon. Droit Civil. 2e anée .Les Obligations. Hypercours & Travaux dirigés. Dalloz. 2018.
xi. Vincent Gautrais. Le Contract électronique international: Encadrement Juridique. 2e édition. Academia Bruylant. 2003.
Fourth: The Laws
i. The French law of Contract amended by the ordinance n° 2016-131 dated February 10, 2016, concerning reforms of the law of contract, general regime and proof of obligations. .
ii. The Iraqi civil law No 40 of 1951.
iii. The Iraqi law of electronic signature and electronic bargains No. 78 in 2012.
Fifth: The Legal Studies& Reports
i. Dan E. Stigall. Iraqi Civil Law: Its Sources, Substance, and Sundering. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy. Volume 16. Number 1.2006.
ii. Mustafa Mekki. France - The French Reform of Contract Law: The Art of Redoing Without Undoing. Journal of Civil Law Studies. Volume 10. Number 1. 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.