Remedies breach content of contract Study in French law according to the Decree 131-2016 and the preliminary draft amendment to the Civil Liability Act of 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/jols.v34i5.304Keywords:
Content of contract, Weak enforcement, DamagesAbstract
The Contracts must be executed according to their content. Therefore, the parties must fulfill their obligations as stipulated in the contract content. If one of them Do not execute his obligations, his contractual responsibility is to breach the contractual content of his contract.
This principle does not differ in law, but the difference lies in what is wrong or not, as well as different ways to address this breach.
The breach is not limited to the failure of the parties to fulfill the obligations under the contract, but the description of the breach applies to the cases of non-implementation of obligations not mentioned in the contract - secondary obligations - and the liability is also contractual, by virtue of charging the legislator one of the parties to the contract some obligations on the occasion of the original contract, Or as a result of the nature of the contract or as required by the principle of good faith not only the liability of the debtor for the obligations mentioned in the contract, but be responsible for what is the requirements of the contract.
The French legislator has decided on a set of options for the creditor, which, at the same time, is a penalty for the contractor who violates his contractual obligations, as justice requires that anyone harmed by the act should compensate for the damage caused.
Downloads
References
I. الان بينا بنت ، القانون المدني ، العقود الخاصة المدنية والتجارية ، ترجمة منصور القاضي ، ط 1 ، مجد المؤسسة الجامعية للدراسات والنشر والتوزيع ، بيروت – لبنان ، 2004
ثانياً : الكتب باللغة الفرنسية
I. Arnaud Thomas, Le dommage et le préjudice (art. 1235 et 1258), Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Cedace, 27.juillet 2017
II. Brunehilde Barry , La reparation en nature , : Thèses de l’IFR LGDJ - Lextenso Editions ,Presses de l’Université Toulouse 1 Capitole ,2016
III. Charlotte Deslauriers-Goulet ,L’obligation essentielle dans le contrat, Faculté de droit de l’Université Laval,Volume 55, Number 4, December 2014
IV. Avocats Picovschi, Responsabilité contractuelle : la faute dans l'exécution du contrat, Mis à jour le 14/12/2015, http://www.lawyers-picovschi.com/
V. Geneviève Viney , La réparation en nature du dommage contractuel et le principe de proportionnalité , Revue des contrats - n°2 – 2007
VI. Hariz Saidani , La rupture du contrat , These , université de Toulon, francais,, 2016
VII. Clément François , La Réduction Du Prix , l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne https://iej.univ-Paris1.fr/
VIII. Guillaume Weiszberg , Le « Raisonnable » en Droit du Commerce International , Pour le doctorat en droit de l'Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) Thèse soutenue publiquement le 7 novembre 2003 Prix récompensant les meilleures thèses de doctorat de l’Université Paris II (Panthéon-Assas), 2004
IX. Eric Brousseau et M'hand Fares , Règles de droit et inexécution du contrat, L’apport de la théorie économique des contrats au droit compare , Revue d'économie politique ,Dalloz 2002/6 (vol.112)
X. René Savatier , Les Sanctions Attachées A L'inexécution Des obligations Contractuelles , Rapport De Synthése Présenté Aux Journées 1964 ,De l'Association Henri CapITANT Des Amis De la Culture Juridique Francaise , Revue internationale de droit comparé Vol. 16 N°4, Octobre-décembre
ثالثاً : القوانين ومشروعات اصلاح القوانين باللغة الفرنسية
I. Code civil des Français _ Code Napoléon 1804
II. Code de procédure civile Version consolidée au 1 janvier 2018
III. L’avant-projet prévoit l’opposabilité « aux victimes d’un préjudice par ricochet » de la faute ou de l’inexécution contractuelle de la « victime directe » (art. 1256). C’est là une réaffirmation implicite mais suffisante du caractère réparable du dommage par ricochet
IV. Jorf N°0035 du 11 février 2016 texte N° 25 : Rapport au Président de la République relatif à l'ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016
V. Rapport au Président de la République relatif à l'ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016
VI. Pierre Catala -Personnes ayant participé à la preparation de l’avant-projet Présentation générale de l’avant-projet 22 Septembre 2005
VII. Pour une réforme du droit de la responsabilité civile » Sous la direction de François Terré 2012
VIII. Projet De Reforme De La Responsabilite Civile Mars 2017
IX. Projet d'oronnance N 2008-1-199 , La réforme du droit des contrats, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations-Ministère de la justice
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
