The Dual Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on the Crime of Genocide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35246/dqpqag96Keywords:
Genocide, Artificial Intelligence, International Crimes, Dual Impact, International TribunalsAbstract
The dual impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on genocide lies in its potential to serve either as a tool for preventing mass atrocities or as a means to facilitate their commission. On the one hand, AI can contribute to the early detection of genocide indicators through big data analysis, monitoring hate speech, and identifying patterns of violence before they escalate. AI has become a modern field of global interest, as it is expected to play a significant role in the future of humanity. It focuses on designing machines that exhibit intelligent behavior similar to humans, enabling the international community to intervene to prevent crimes. By employing machine learning techniques, AI can accurately document violations and collect forensic evidence to support international justice. While new technologies and modern technical applications offer numerous advantages—saving time and effort, reducing costs, and increasing efficiency—they also carry significant risks. AI poses considerable dangers when used in international crimes, as it could target human groups without direct human supervision, thereby undermining the principle of legal accountability. Furthermore, AI applications may be exploited for propaganda or to identify vulnerable minority groups through the analysis of large-scale digital data. Thus, AI represents a double-edged sword: while it can enhance human security and prevent international crimes, it can also become a powerful tool for committing them if misused or left without clear legal regulations.
Downloads
References
I. United Nations. (1948, December 9). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml
II. Budapest Centre for the International Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities. (2023). The rise of artificial intelligence: Risks from the perspective of mass atrocities.
III. Zhao, L. (2024). Ideal regulations of AI: To stop genocide and war crimes. SSRN Electronic Journal.
IV. Law School. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in international human rights law.
V. Kirabira, J. (2021). Technology as a key tool for the prosecution of international crimes: A case study of Uganda. University of East London.
VI. Vincent, J. (2023, July 19). AI-generated deepfakes are fueling disinformation and hate speech online.
VII. Alharbi, A., & Lee, M. (2022). Arabic fake news detection based on deep contextualized embedding models.
VIII. Gavurova, B., & Kubak, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence deepfakes: Systematic review and public attitudes in seven European countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.
IX. International Criminal Court. (2002). Ongwen case. https://www.icc-cpi.int/victims/ongwen-case
Arabic Resources:
X. Dahiliya, J. A. (2021). The Crime of Genocide in International Law: An Analytical Study. (Master's Thesis, An-Najah National University.
XI. Hassan, K. M. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technology on International Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 59(2).
XII. Abdel-Mohsen, M. A. A. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Combating Crime Using Modern Technological Technologies. Scientific Journal – Al-Azhar University, Issue 37, Part1.
XIII. Saeed, W. S. M. (2022). Criminal Liability Arising from Artificial Intelligence Applications. Journal of Legal and Economic Sciences, 64(2).
XIV. Abdel-Karim, A. S., & Al-Khafaji, A. H. A. (2023). The Technological Role and its Impact on Criminal Policy. Journal of the College of Law for Legal and Political Sciences – Kirkuk University.
XV. Al-Sakhawneh, S. A., & Al-Atoum, S. A. The Role of Social Media in Spreading Hate Speech from the Perspective of Jordanian Journalists. Journal of the Islamic University for Sharia and Legal Studies.
XVI. Al-Najjar, S. F. M. (2024). Criminal responsibilities arising from artificial intelligence crimes. Journal of Imam Al-Sadiq University (PBUH) for Legal Studies, Issue7.
XVII. Ali, R., S. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Data Analysis Techniques in Crime Detection. Journal of Legal and Economic Studies.
XVIII. Abdul-Malik, R. M. (2024). The United Nations' Efforts in Addressing the Use of Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Journal of Legal Studies, Issue 64, Part2.
XIX. Hadi, H. T. (2020). The Legal and Security Confrontation of Terrorism Crimes. Journal of the Iraqi University, 45(2).
Downloads
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Legal Sciences, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Journal of Legal Sciences cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.
