Intelligent arbitration of DAOs disputes

Authors

  • Assistant Professor Doctor Lobna Abdalhusen Easa
  • Professor Doctor Jalil Hassan Bashat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35246/h7jwbq41

Keywords:

digital, decentralized organizations, blockchain, smart contracts, dispute

Abstract

Smart arbitration in disputes involving Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) utilizes blockchain technology and smart contracts to provide efficient solutions for resolving conflicts within the complex digital economy. DAOs, as decentralized entities operating on blockchain protocols, present a new model of governance and contracting that challenges traditional legal frameworks. Given their decentralized and jurisdictionally non-affiliated nature, these organizations encounter difficulties in determining jurisdiction in cases of dispute. However, smart arbitration, relying on automation and transparency provided by smart contracts, can facilitate the swift and effective enforcement of arbitral awards. It offers solutions that transcend the traditional boundaries of the judiciary, allowing arbitration procedures to be executed according to the codes programmed into smart contracts, thereby affording disputing parties access to fair resolutions without the need for traditional litigation. This approach opens new horizons for justice in the digital age and proposes innovative alternatives for addressing contemporary legal challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

First: books

i. De Filippi, Primavera and Aaron Wright, Blockchain and the Law (Harvard University Press 2018)

ii. Werbach, Kevin, “The Siren Song: Algorithmic Governance by Blockchain”, in Kevin Werbach (ed), After the Digital Tornado – Networks, Algorithms, Humanity (Cambridge University Press 2020).

Second: Research and articles

i. Aiden Slavin, Kevin Werbach, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: Beyond the Hype, In collaboration with the Wharton Blockchain and, Digital Asset ProjecT, last visit (22/4/2024)., available: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Decentralized_Autonomous_Organizations_Beyond_the_Hype_2022.pdf ,

ii. Ast, Federico and Bruno Deffains, “When Online Dispute Resolution Meets Blockchain: The Birth of Decentralized Justice” 2021, 4.2 Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy.

iii. Al-Saeedi, Lubna Abdul Hussein Easa Al-Saeedi. 2022. “The Privacy of the Insurance Contract for Self-Driving Cars: A Comparative Study”. Journal of Legal Sciences 37 (2): 304-39. https://www.jols.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jols/article/view/551

iv. Cristiano BellavitisChristian FischChristian FischPaul P. MomtazPaul P. Momtaz, the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) a first empirical glimpse, August 2022, last visit (22/4/2024), available https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363155263_The_rise_of_decentralized_autonomous_organizations_DAOs_a_first_empirical_glimpse#fullTextFileContent.

v. Dale, Brady, “DeFi Is Now a $100B Sector” (Coindesk, 29 April 2021) Available on on https://www.coindesk.com/defi-100-billiondolla ,Coindesk last visit (5/1/ 2023).

vi. Devanesan, Ruha and Jeffrey Aresty, “ODR and Justice – An evaluation of Online Dispute Resolution’s Interplay with Traditional Theories of Justice”, in Mohamed S. Abdel Wahab, Ethan Katsh and Daniel Rainey, Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (eleven 2012).

vii. Diptiben Ghelani Diptiben Ghelani, What is Non-fungible token (NFT)? A short discussion about NFT Terms used in NFT October 2022, available on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364155223_What_is_Non-fungible_token_NFT_A_short_discussion_about_NFT_Terms_used_in_NFT# , last visit (2/2/2024)

viii. Garcimartin, Francisco and Geneviève Saumier, Explanatory Report of the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (HCCH 2020)

ix. Guillaume, Florence & Sven Riva, BLOCKCHAIN DISPUTE RESOLUTION FOR DECENTRALIZED AUTONOMOUS ORGANIZATIONS: THE RISE OF DECENTRALIZED AUTONOMOUS JUSTICE, available on: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4042704, last visit (1/12/2023).

x. Florence Guillaume, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Before State Courts, How can private international law keep up with global digital entities?the University of Neuchâtel ,available https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4492934 , (Switzerland).

xi. Jaaz, Muna Naiem. "The Implicit fault in the scope of medical liability Study with French and Iraqi judicial decisions." Iklīl for Humanities Studies 3.4 ج2 (2022).‏

xii. Jun Hong Tan, Duxton Hill Chambers, Blockchain “Arbitration” for NFT-Related Disputes, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, , May 2023,Available on https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4465828.

xiii. Herik, Jaap van den and Daniel Dimov, “Towards Crowdsourced Online Dispute Resolution”, in S. Kierkegaard and P. Kierkegaard (eds), Law Across Nations: Governance, Policy and Statutes (International Association of IT Lawyers 2011), 244-257, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=193339 ,last visit (5 November 2023).

xiv. Hertig, Alyssa, “What is DeFi?” (Coindesk, 18 September 2020) Available on https://www.coindesk.com/what-is-defi , Coindesk last visit (5/1/ 2023).

xv. Hussein, Assist Prof Dr Lubna Abdel, Assist Prof Dr Hazem Akram, and Lecturer Faris Kamel Hassan. "Legal regulation of artificial intelligent agent" comparative study"." AL-ANBAR University Journal of Law and Political Sciences 14.1 bart: 1 (2024).‏

xvi. Kaal, Wulf A., “Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance” (2021) 4 Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy 0,6.

xvii. Kaal, Wulf A. and Craig Calcaterra, “Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution” (2017-2018)

xviii. Koulu, Rikka and Kalle Markkanen, “Conflict Management for Regulation-Averse Blockchains?”, in Rosa Maria Ballardini, Petri Kuoppamäki and Olli Pitkänen (eds), Regulating industrial Internet through IPR, Data Protection and Competition Law (Wolters Kluwer 2019),

xix. Lesaege, George and Ast, Kleros Short Paper v1.0.6, Nov. 2018, available at https://ipfs.kleros.io/ipfs/QmdH7vuFVATLqdsvWXBBq38fUX2jRp7tbiQ1MvBr8SDxBc , last visit (19/2/2023).

xx. Muslim, Nibras Ibrahim, and Mustafa Salim Abed AlBkeet. "Criminal justice of juveniles in the context of crimes of an international character." AL-ANBAR University Journal of Law and Political Sciences 8.2 (2018).‏

xxi. Mihna, Faris Kamil Hasan, et al. "Using Information Technology for Comprehensive Analysis and Prediction in Forensic Evidence." Mesopotamian Journal of CyberSecurity 4.1 (2024): 4-16.‏

xxii. Yann AouidefFederico AstFederico AstBruno DeffainsBruno Deffains, Decentralized Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Online Dispute Resolution Projects. March 2021 Frontiers in Blockchain ,Available on https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350092089_Decentralized_Justice_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Blockchain_Online_Dispute_Resolution_Projects

Third: Locations

i. World Economic Forum (WEF), “Bridging the Governance Gap: Dispute Resolution for Blockchain-Based Transactions”, 16 /12/ 2020, Available on https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/93bd1530-0ded-48fa8deee9b2d109d84d ,last visit (5 /11/ 2023).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-15

How to Cite

Lobna Abdalhusen Easa, and Jalil Hassan Bashat. 2024. “Intelligent Arbitration of DAOs Disputes”. Journal of Legal Sciences 39 (1): 408-51. https://doi.org/10.35246/h7jwbq41.

Similar Articles

61-70 of 80

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.